Compare Fortinet FortiOS vs. Infoblox Secure DNS

Fortinet FortiOS is ranked 20th in Firewalls with 15 reviews while Infoblox Secure DNS is ranked 4th in Internet Security with 1 review. Fortinet FortiOS is rated 8.2, while Infoblox Secure DNS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiOS writes "Provides an easy and simple means of filtering traffic and establishing VPN connections and authentication". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Infoblox Secure DNS writes "Helped us protect our internal environment by mitigating and stopping attacks by using DNS protocols and queries". Fortinet FortiOS is most compared with Darktrace, Azure Firewall and Sangfor NGAF, whereas Infoblox Secure DNS is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Zscaler Internet Access and Palo Alto Networks Prisma SaaS.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Cisco ASA NGFW Logo
70,048 views|52,237 comparisons
Fortinet FortiOS Logo
1,567 views|1,257 comparisons
Infoblox Secure DNS Logo
5,436 views|4,235 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Chukwunenye Ekwe Jnr.
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, pfSense and others in Firewalls. Updated: September 2019.
372,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The firepower sensors have been great; they do a good job of dropping unwanted traffic.Unfortunately in Cisco, only the hardware was good.The most important point is the detection engine which is now part of the next-generation firewalls and which is supported by Cisco Talos.The most valuable features are the flexibility and level of security that this solution provides.Integration with all the other Cisco tools is valuable.We moved from a legacy firewall to the ASA with FirePOWER, increasing our Internet Edge defense dramatically.Cisco ASA NGFW significantly improves our bank. It protects any high-value products that we use from hackers, viruses, malware, and script-bots. It gives us metrics on network traffic as well as what kind of attacks we are getting from the outside.Right now, Cisco ASA NGFW has given us a lot of improvement. We are planning to move to a new facility and will be a much larger organization.

Read more »

A good network security system for medium-sized businesses with an excellent GUI interface that gives a graphic view of network status.The solution is extremely scalable.This is an easy means of setting up high-availabilty firewall protection.The initial setup is easy. It's the easiest firewall installation process on the market. I work with three or four other products and this one is the easiest.The most valuable feature of this solution would be the caching feature.It has a lot of scalability abilities which makes it easy to scale.What I like about this solution, is that it is the only solution that currently offers VPN for clients.The technical support is very good and the assistance they gave was very good.

Read more »

Infoblox Secure DNS helped us protect our internal environment by mitigating and stopping attacks through the Internet using DNS protocols and queries.Centralized management of DNS, DHCP, and IPAM helped us a lot in simplifying and automating the management of network and services.Grid high availability technology ensured network reliability, resilient network services, failover, recovery, and seamless maintenance.

Read more »

Cons
The software was very buggy, to the point it had to be removed.In NGFW, Cisco should be aligned with the new technology and inspection intelligence because Cisco is far behind in this pipeline.Most users do not have awareness of this product's functionality and features. Cisco should do something to make them aware of them. That would be quite excellent and useful to organizations that are still using legacy data-center-security products.There was an error in the configuration, related to our uplink switches, that caused us to contact technical support, and it took a very long time to resolve the issue.With regards to stability, we had a critical bug come out during our evaluation... not good.The product would be improved if the GUI could be brought into the 21st Century.Cisco should improve its user interface design. There is a deep learning curve to the product if you are a newcomer.There is no support here in Georgia. If something goes wrong, support is not always very helpful with the other firewalls or other products.

Read more »

While it is a solid solution, there are some product limitations which exclude it from deployment in some situations.The solution needs to adjust its pricing models. With the way they are structured, everything is very disparate and sold separately, and, depending on the solution, it can get quite pricey.The support is not very good, but the product is stable so it is not so much of a problem.In terms of what needs improvements, the troubleshooting could use improvement. When we work with other products like Cisco ASA, Palo Alto, and Check Point, we see a big difference in the troubleshooting. It's not easy to find a report.Their technical support needs improvement.In terms of what needs improvement, the pricing could be lower. The price is very steep.In the future I would like to see more user-friendly dashboards and a drop in the price.The GUI could be improved to make it more usable, easier to administer, and easier to configure.

Read more »

I think only the technical documentation and administration of box could be a little bit improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Always consider what you might need to reduce your wasted time and invest it in other solutions.Watch out for hidden licensing and incredibly high annual maintenance costs.We paid about $7,000 for the Cisco firewall, plus another small Cisco router and the lead switch. It was under the combined license. It's a final agreement.The cost is a big factor for us. This is why we are using it only in our restricted area. They are very much higher than their competitors in the market.Licensing is expensive compared to other solutions.Pricing is high, but it is essentially a corporate decision.The cost is a bit high compared to other solutions in the market.Cisco recently has become very expensive.

Read more »

Pricing depends on implementation and licensing choices and is usually not a practical budget choice for small businesses.We pay $100,000. That covers the cost of the hardware that we run the VN's on. That also includes any SGNA costs for the internal support tech.Be sure to choose a licensing plan that leaves a little headroom so performance is not an issue.We pay an annual license fee. It is rather expensive so I would like to perhaps see a drop in price in the future.The program is expensive.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
372,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 38% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
Cisco ASA, Adaptive Security Appliance, ASA
Learn
Cisco
Fortinet
Infoblox
Overview

Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) is Cisco's end-to-end software solution and core operating system that powers the Cisco ASA product series. This software solution provides enterprise-level firewall capabilities for all types of ASA products, including blades, standalone appliances and virtual devices. Adaptive Security Appliance provides protection to organizations of all sizes, and allows end-users to access information securely anywhere, at any time, and through any device.

Adaptive Security Appliance is also fully compatible with other key security technologies, and so provides organizations with an all-encompassing security solution.

Block more threats and quickly mitigate those that do breach your defenses with the industry’s first threat-focused NGFW.

Control all the security and networking capabilities in all your FortiGates across your entire network with one intuitive operating system. Improve your protection and visibility while reducing operating expenses and saving time with a truly consolidated next generation enterprise firewall platform.

DNS is one of the fastest growing attack vectors because it’s essential for network connectivity, and current security solutions are not designed to protect it. Distributed denial of service (DDoS) and other external and internal DNS-based threats can flood your DNS server with malicious requests, bringing down your network. These attacks can redirect users to harmful Internet destinations, exfiltrate data, and expose your customers and business to additional risks. Security technologies such as NextGen firewalls, IPS, and generic DDoS solutions do not understand DNS and are unable to prevent specific attacks such as DNS cache poisoning, DNS hijacking, reflection attacks, amplification attacks, and many others.

With Infoblox Advanced DNS Protection, you can comprehensively defend your DNS server from the widest range of DNS-based attacks, while maintaining service availability and business continuity.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco ASA NGFW
Learn more about Fortinet FortiOS
Learn more about Infoblox Secure DNS
Sample Customers
There are more than one million Adaptive Security Appliances deployed globally. Top customers include First American Financial Corp., Genzyme, Frankfurt Airport, Hansgrohe SE, Rio Olympics, The French Laundry, Rackspace, and City of Tomorrow.Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension DataColruyt Group, Council Rock School District, Danone, GlaxoSmithKline, The Hershey Company
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm17%
Comms Service Provider11%
Manufacturing Company11%
University8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company8%
Manufacturing Company6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider43%
Transportation Company29%
Pharma/Biotech Company14%
Financial Services Firm14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Comms Service Provider13%
Government13%
Financial Services Firm8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise39%
REVIEWERS
Small Business54%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise15%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Cisco, pfSense and others in Firewalls. Updated: September 2019.
372,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email