We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"The product can be automated for network security purposes. The solution offers a great security automation response."
"It has a quick detection and response time."
"What I like the most is the ability to manage centrally, to manage the various devices, the platform, and the endpoint, all from one console."
"I don't currently see where the solution is lacking features. For us and for our clients it works very well and we're pleased with it."
"The area that needs improvement is integration with multiple third-party vendors."
"The rollout to cover the online resources, such as SharePoint, One Drive, and Office 365 doesn't seem to have a very clear path."
"Pricing is fine compared to other solutions."
"For large enterprise companies, the price should be alright, but for small businesses, the uptake might be slow because, for these clients, the price doesn't look very attractive."
As the digital attack surface expands, security teams must also expand their defense capabilities. Yet, adding additional security monitoring tools is not always the answer. Additional monitoring tools means more alerts for security teams to investigate, more context switching in the investigation process, and slower response times. This creates a number of challenges for security teams including alert fatigue, a lack of qualified security personnel to manage new tools, and slower response times.
Integrated into the Fortinet Security Fabric, FortiSOAR security orchestration, automation and response (SOAR) remedies some of the biggest challenges facing cybersecurity teams today. Allowing security operation center (SOC) teams to create a custom automated framework that pulls together all of their organization's tools unifies operations, eliminating alert fatigue and reducing context switching. This allows enterprises to not only adapt, but also optimize their security process.
Cloud-based Security Management
Remove the setup and maintenance of on-premises security management infrastructure, so you can focus on monitoring your endpoints and mobile devices.
Enforce Security from a Single View
Easy-to-follow panels and dashboards assess your security posture. Stay current with summaries of the latest threat information and advisories.
Streamline Operations, Minimize Risk
Automated and straightforward workflows drive security operational efficiencies. Optional workflow approval requires policy or tasks to be reviewed, assuring higher-quality results.
Fortinet FortiSOAR is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 2 reviews while McAfee MVISION ePO is ranked 9th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. Fortinet FortiSOAR is rated 7.0, while McAfee MVISION ePO is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSOAR writes "Quick detection and response time, with helpful playbooks used to automate our response". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee MVISION ePO writes "Easy to set up and lets you centrally manage devices and endpoints from a single console". Fortinet FortiSOAR is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Cisco SecureX, Splunk Phantom, IBM Resilient and ServiceNow Security Operations, whereas McAfee MVISION ePO is most compared with McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, Splunk Phantom and Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.