Fortinet FortiToken vs OneSpan DIGIPASS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortinet Logo
6,743 views|5,235 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
OneSpan Logo
949 views|781 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiToken and OneSpan DIGIPASS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is simple and similar to Google Authenticator. It follows time-based authentication. We use it for hardware and software in one environment. The tool offers simple and fast authentication for SSL.""The initial setup is easy. You receive a QR code via email, scan it, and add it. No complicated procedures involved.""The product provides secure access to our internal server.""Fortinet FortiToken provides security and authenticates that the right external people are working with a company's system.""I love the push-button authentication on FortiToken Mobile. It's also great that the soft token automatically reloads the OTP at intervals, so I always have a fresh code to enter.""Its ease of use is most valuable. It is simple to use and can be deployed out-of-the-box. It is quite a mature product with all the required features.""FortiToken is available in a soft or hard token factor, so there's some flexibility in that. Beyond that, I would say it is a stable solution that has worked for us.""The deployment is quick and simple."

More Fortinet FortiToken Pros →

"OneSpan Digipass is very useful, easy to use and work with."

More OneSpan DIGIPASS Pros →

Cons
"Fortinet support has some room for improvement. It has taken a long time to resolve some issues or find a workaround.""The app could be improved so that you don't have to actually type in the code. It would be great if you can just do a prompt or push similar to the way Duo does.""You need your mobile just to enroll the tokens, and sometimes, it's difficult to use for someone who is not knowledgeable""Fortinet FortiToken could be lower for some markets.""Support is a pain point in Bangladesh because there aren't many experienced Fortinet engineers in this country. It's easier to find one certified in Cisco, Palo Alto, or Juniper.""I would like to see complete OAuth support. Also, if they can support it from a SaaS (Software as a Service) or cloud platform, that would be great.""Maybe the price could be improved, and the integration could be better. But the integration is different from the authenticator side.""The solution could introduce a mobile application instead of a physical product."

More Fortinet FortiToken Cons →

"At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code."

More OneSpan DIGIPASS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is included as part of our firewall license."
  • "Overall, it's cheaper than other solutions. Of course, we evaluated it five years back, and I haven't checked to see its current market position, but one reason we adopted FortiToken is its lower cost of ownership relative to other solutions we evaluated."
  • "I would rate the pricing as an eight out of ten. We purchased the solution at a reasonable price in 2019."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is the cheapest, and ten is the highest, I rate the pricing an eight."
  • "The solution’s price is good."
  • "Fortinet FortiToken is not an expensive solution."
  • "The pricing is not very high, so I'd rate it around six out of ten, where one is high and ten is low."
  • "From an Indian perspective, it's definitely costlier."
  • More Fortinet FortiToken Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The token-based authentication is good and modern aspect.
    Top Answer:The management configuration seems a bit complex and could benefit from user guides or better support resources. It could be improved in terms of user-friendliness. Not like the other FortiGate… more »
    Top Answer:We're aiming to provide every user with mobile token-based two-factor authentication (2FA) to enhance security. It's for internal security.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    Views
    6,743
    Comparisons
    5,235
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    460
    Rating
    8.3
    22nd
    Views
    949
    Comparisons
    781
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    VASCO DIGIPASS, DIGIPASS
    Learn More
    Overview

    As we've seen, passwords alone don't keep unwanted guests out of your network. Password-only authentication has led to security breaches, malware infections, and policy violations. With two-factor authentication, a password is used along with a security token and authentication server to provide far better security.  Authorized employees can remotely access company resources safely using a variety of devices, ranging from lpatops to mobile phones.

    DIGIPASS authenticators are the most effective first-line-of-defense and have a proven record of stopping hacking attacks.
    Sample Customers
    Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
    AGBank, Odeabank, Bradesco, Briggs and Morgan, Caixa Galicia, Chicago Clearing House Association, Diamond Bank Plc, DnB NOR, Document Centric Solutions
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Engineering Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Government7%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise19%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise48%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise61%
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortinet FortiToken is ranked 4th in Authentication Systems with 20 reviews while OneSpan DIGIPASS is ranked 22nd in Authentication Systems. Fortinet FortiToken is rated 8.2, while OneSpan DIGIPASS is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiToken writes "A stable and scalable solution that provides an affordable and perpetual license". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OneSpan DIGIPASS writes "Good authentication options, but the setup can be complex and the user interface should be improved". Fortinet FortiToken is most compared with Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Yubico YubiKey and RSA SecurID, whereas OneSpan DIGIPASS is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Cisco Duo, Yubico YubiKey, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and RSA SecurID.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.