We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] and Fortinet FortiWLC based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE Aruba Networking, Cato Networks, Citrix and others in WAN Optimization."The most valuable feature is optimization."
"The most valuable feature is connectivity."
"It's easy to set everything up during implementation."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiWLC is the overall high quality."
"Having more documentation would be helpful."
"From a security perspective, FortiWAN needs to be improved."
"Fortinet FortiWLC is not simple to configure when compared to other solutions. The design could be better."
"One thing that is lacking is, compared with some other brands, the signal is a bit weaker. Ruckus has much wider signal coverage."
Earn 20 points
Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in WAN Optimization while Fortinet FortiWLC is ranked 25th in Wireless LAN with 2 reviews. Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is rated 7.6, while Fortinet FortiWLC is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] writes "Easy to deploy with good connectivity and robustness for managing WAN links". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWLC writes "Quick support, overall high quality, and reliable". Fortinet FortiWAN [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Fortinet FortiWLC is most compared with Fortinet FortiWLM, Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and Cisco Wireless.
We monitor all WAN Optimization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
