We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Fortinet FortiWeb vs. R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll)

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Microsoft, Amazon and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"One of the big advantages of using Fortinet FortiWeb is all the Fortinet family solutions use the same user interface and logic. This makes it easy to use, configure, manage, and understand if you have used one of their solutions before or are wanting to implement other Fortinet solutions in the future. Additionally, all Fortinet solutions can be managed with one application called FortiManager.""The GUI is user-friendly.""The GUI is user-friendly and it's easy to understand how to manage it.""It is a stable product.""I have recently been looking at the SSL certificate features and the learning mode of the appliance. This appliance learns from the pattern of SSL attacks.""The solution has a very simple deployment.""This product is very user-friendly.""FortiGate is a stable product."

More Fortinet FortiWeb Pros »

"The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis."

More R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) Pros »

Cons
"The support side of things can be improved.""They could improve their support a little bit for faster response time.""We have had problems with deployments where we've had to contact technical support to resolve them.""The solution could improve by providing more integration with solutions other than the Fortinet family.""The dashboard evaluating the performance of each application connected to the web app's firewall is quite helpful, but the tool is only available in application performance management. So I think if Fortinet could better integrate that particular feature, it would add a lot of value to the product.""Fortinet WAF came out recently, and there is not much feedback about customer experience. For each project, customers ask about the scenarios and references of the customers who have implemented this solution, which we don't have. They need to simplify the customer experience and provide more information so that we can propose Fortinet Fortiweb as a WAF solution to customers and convince them. They need to improve their service and training. We need good training to implement and use it properly and know more about it. We still don't know much about Fortinet WAF. We didn't get any proper training sessions. Other vendors like Cisco, Palo Alto, Check Point, and Barracuda provide such sessions. Whenever we receive a request from a customer for this solution, we just give the price. We don't propose this solution because we don't know much about it. We propose whatever we are familiar with and what is supported.""The solution could offer more integration opportunities.""In terms of performance, it needs to be more robust."

More Fortinet FortiWeb Cons »

"The area that should be improved is licensing."

More R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There are no licensing costs.""It is an expensive suite and it is an expensive solution, but it is a manageable one for an enterprise.""Its subscription prices are cheaper, and it is not very expensive. From a price perspective, Fortinet is a very well-known security vendor. Subscriptions are very simple. They have a couple of licenses on an appliance, and that's it. The cost is not that big. One license is 40K, which they give with all the products. Another one includes the subscriptions for threat prevention, IPS, sandboxing, etc, which is more than enough.""The price is competitive.""FortiWeb is more expensive than some competing products.""It's an expensive solution, although there are no additional costs.""The costs are standard. We pay around $1,600 yearly.""Due to the situation in Iran with the sanctions, the price of this solution is very expensive."

More Fortinet FortiWeb Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: You have the ability to control everything from one single dashboard.
Top Answer: We are on an annual license for this solution and the price is approximately €100.
Top Answer: The solution could improve by being able to handle different use cases.
Top Answer: Imperva is a strong choice, given their security focus and ongoing R&D into the product in areas such as bot management.
Ranking
Views
15,871
Comparisons
12,915
Reviews
21
Average Words per Review
437
Rating
8.1
Views
401
Comparisons
288
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
479
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rohde & Schwarz Web Application Firewall, R&S WAF, DenyAll Web Application Security
Learn More
Overview

FortiWeb is a web application firewall (WAF) that protects hosted web applications from attacks that target known and unknown exploits. Using multi-layered and correlated detection methods, FortiWeb defends applications from known vulnerabilities and from zero-day threats.

Beyond the basic capabilities of traditional negative and positive security models, DenyAll’s scoring mechanism, user behavior tracking and advanced detection engines deliver best-of-breed security that won’t let you down. None of our customers have made the headlines with security breaches.

Web Services and automated machine-to-machine communications support business processes, internal and with ecosystem partners that are often critical. DenyAll makes it easy to optimize and secure these XML-based data flows, with capabilities found in no other WAF or SOA Gateway.

Offer
Learn more about Fortinet FortiWeb
Learn more about R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll)
Sample Customers
Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Comms Service Provider25%
Government13%
Computer Software Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider32%
Computer Software Company27%
Government6%
Financial Services Firm4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider27%
Government13%
Financial Services Firm4%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business46%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise30%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, Microsoft, Amazon and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: November 2021.
552,305 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fortinet FortiWeb is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 24 reviews while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 18th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. Fortinet FortiWeb is rated 8.2, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWeb writes "Reasonably priced and offers a good graphical user interface but need better integration capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". Fortinet FortiWeb is most compared with Fortinet FortiOS, Fortinet FortiADC, F5 Advanced WAF, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and PerimeterX Bot Defender.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.