Fortscale vs IBM Security Secret Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I believe that we paid 35,000 or 40,000 US dollars for it."
  • "My rating for the IBM Security Secret Server pricing is seven out of ten. It could be cheaper."
  • "The price could be better. I think it's a good price for the on-premises environment and the high availability for enterprises the solution provides."
  • More IBM Security Secret Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Activity Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Stability-wise, I think it is a very good solution.
    Top Answer:The nonclustered index is working in an area with a problem that needs improvement. In some cases, when they create some index in the tool, you may face some problems with the parallelism and some… more »
    Top Answer:I use the tool for dynamic services, integration services, and reporting services. I have years of working experience with the tool. I am a DBA and a support administrator for SQL Server, and also all… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    Views
    16
    Comparisons
    12
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    818
    Comparisons
    546
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    686
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fortscale UEBA for SOC
    IBM Secret Server, Secret Server, IBM Security Privileged Identity Manager
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fortscale delivers the intelligence needed to detect risks posed by different users and entities, so critical resources can be protected and appropriate controls implemented to improve an organization’s security stance. Unlike other solutions that rely on predefined rules, Fortscale combines predictive, big data analytics with advanced machine learning to accurately uncover real-time security risks. There are no limits – with selftuning anomaly detection that accurately identifies risks in an organization’s unique environment, security analysts have all they need to quickly identify and shut down attacks.

    IBM Security Secret Server protects privileged accounts from hackers and insider threats, helps ensure compliance with evolving regulations, and allows authorized employees to seamlessly gain access to the tools and information they need to drive productivity. Easily detect, manage and audit privileged accounts, and control which applications are permitted to run on endpoints and servers to prevent malicious applications from penetrating the environment. IBM Security Secret Server is fast to deploy, easy to use and scalable for the enterprise.

    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Zurich, Platech
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%

    Fortscale is ranked 9th in User Activity Monitoring while IBM Security Secret Server is ranked 13th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 7 reviews. Fortscale is rated 0.0, while IBM Security Secret Server is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security Secret Server writes "User-friendly, granular features, and is simple to implement, but the technical support could be improved". Fortscale is most compared with , whereas IBM Security Secret Server is most compared with Delinea Secret Server, Delinea Privileged Access Service and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.

    We monitor all User Activity Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.