Fortscale vs Microsoft ATA [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fortscale Logo
69 views|54 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
views| comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortscale and Microsoft ATA [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA).
To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I believe we are looking into new licenses. They may be called the E5. Honestly, I don't have it on top of my mind, but I think it's around seven to $10 a user per month."
  • More Microsoft ATA [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    69
    Comparisons
    54
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fortscale UEBA for SOC
    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics, MS ATA [EOL]
    Learn More
    Overview

    Fortscale delivers the intelligence needed to detect risks posed by different users and entities, so critical resources can be protected and appropriate controls implemented to improve an organization’s security stance. Unlike other solutions that rely on predefined rules, Fortscale combines predictive, big data analytics with advanced machine learning to accurately uncover real-time security risks. There are no limits – with selftuning anomaly detection that accurately identifies risks in an organization’s unique environment, security analysts have all they need to quickly identify and shut down attacks.

    Microsoft Advanced Threat Analytics (ATA) provides a simple and fast way to understand what is happening within your network by identifying suspicious user and device activity with built-in intelligence and providing clear and relevant threat information on a simple attack timeline. Microsoft ATA is an on-premises platform to help you protect your enterprise from advanced targeted attacks by automatically analyzing, learning, and identifying normal and abnormal entity (user, devices, and resources) behavior. It detects suspicious activities and malicious attacks with behavioral analytics, adapts to the changing nature of cyber-security threats, focuses on what is important with a simple attack timeline and reduces false positive fatigue.
    Sample Customers
    Cisco, Zurich, Platech
    Turkish Airlines, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Empa, The Alberta Teachers' Association
    Buyer's Guide
    User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Splunk, Rapid7 and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: April 2024.
    768,246 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fortscale is ranked 29th in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) while Microsoft ATA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Fortscale is rated 0.0, while Microsoft ATA [EOL] is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft ATA [EOL] writes "Easy to define rules but interface needs better granularity and only integrates well with other Microsoft solutions". Fortscale is most compared with , whereas Microsoft ATA [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

    We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.