Foxit PDF SDK vs Templafy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Foxit Software Logo
18 views|12 comparisons
Templafy Logo
65 views|43 comparisons
Ranking
Views
18
Comparisons
12
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
9th
Views
65
Comparisons
43
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Powerful, robust PDF technology in SDK including annotations, digital signatures, form filling & security. Foxit PDF SDK is optimized for Enterprise and Cloud Apps. Key features include PDF rendering, Cross-platform reflow, asynchronous support, page creation and organization. Why choose Foxit? We have better rendering speed and quality, Worldwide support, out of memory management, superior font handling and mobile optimization.

Templafy integrates with the office suites used by companies every day, to automate brand compliance and streamline how users create or edit files.

Sample Customers
The Equitable Bank, Motor Presse Stuttgart, Drees & Sommer, Volvo Car Group, First American Bank
Pandora, BDO, Atea, VELUX, Capgemini, Petrobras, Maersk
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider13%
Computer Software Company12%
Outsourcing Company9%
Government6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise56%
No Data Available

Foxit PDF SDK is ranked 7th in Document Generation Tools while Templafy is ranked 9th in Email Signature Software. Foxit PDF SDK is rated 0.0, while Templafy is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Foxit PDF SDK is most compared with Nitro Pro, Nintex Process Platform, OpenText Brava! and Adobe Acrobat, whereas Templafy is most compared with Windward Core.

See our list of best Document Generation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Document Generation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.