We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Polyspace Bug Finder vs. froglogic Coco Code Coverage

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
7th
out of 8 in Debugging
Views
178
Comparisons
110
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
5th
out of 8 in Debugging
Views
589
Comparisons
76
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
MathWorks
Video Not Available
Overview
Discover All Benefits (Click Here)

The Coco code coverage tool is a complete, cross-platform, cross-compiler tool chain allowing to analyze the test coverage of C, C++, C# and Tcl code.

Coco is used to

  • Find and highlight untested code sections
  • Find redundant tests (i.e., tests that merely duplicate others)
  • Find unreachable code
  • Compute the optimal order of test execution that will maximize the overall coverage
  • Compare the test coverage of two application versions or test executions.

Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/coco/

Start Your Free Trial Today!

Polyspace Bug Finder helps companies identify software bugs via static analysis.

Offer
Learn more about froglogic Coco Code Coverage
Learn more about Polyspace Bug Finder
Sample Customers
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson, ...
Alenia Aermacchi, CSEE Transport, Delphi Diesel Systems, EADS, Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety, Miracor, NASA Ames Research Center
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government7%
Manufacturing Company7%

froglogic Coco Code Coverage is ranked 7th in Debugging while Polyspace Bug Finder is ranked 5th in Debugging. froglogic Coco Code Coverage is rated 0.0, while Polyspace Bug Finder is rated 0.0. On the other hand, froglogic Coco Code Coverage is most compared with GDB, whereas Polyspace Bug Finder is most compared with .

See our list of best Debugging vendors.

We monitor all Debugging reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.