We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. froglogic Squish

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. froglogic Squish and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

More froglogic Squish Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the UI component tester.""It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good.""IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pros »

Cons
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

More froglogic Squish Cons »

"As many of our products are moving from PC to mobile, the most important thing that this solution needs is mobile app support.""If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility.""They need to do a complete revamp so that even a non-technical person can manage the tool."

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

More IBM Rational Functional Tester Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I think the licensing price is okay. I believe for one person, the cost is around 2,000 Euros. That's the initial cost, after that you buy support and it cost 800 Euros, which is much lower, It's a… more »
Top Answer: I'm not completely satisfied because although the ID is good, it could be improved with suggestions of names for some method, for example, or variable, or class. I'd like to see suggestions for… more »
Top Answer: We are customers of Froglogic and I'm an automation quality assurance engineer.
Top Answer: IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual.
Top Answer: RFT needs to think from a contemporary point of view — from the current context. They need to look at the way they're positioning the tool. They need to do a complete revamp so that even a… more »
Top Answer: We provide this solution and others like it to our customers. We have implemented IBM Rational Functional Tester for at least 10 to 15 customers between banking and telecom.
Ranking
16th
Views
6,467
Comparisons
3,291
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
8.0
24th
Views
2,078
Comparisons
1,331
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
607
Rating
6.7
Comparisons
Also Known As
Rational Functional Tester
Learn More
Overview
Discover All Benefits (Click Here)

Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.

Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.

Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.

The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features

  • Desktop, Mobile, Embedded & Web Applications
  • include Qt, QtQuick, QML, Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, Mac, Tk, 4Js, iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java) and Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets.
  • testing on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, Unix. Mobile and Embedded testing on Android, iOS, embedded Linux and RTOSes such as QNX
  • Eclipse-based IDE
  • based object identification & Toolkit API Support
  • tests in your choice of Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby & Tcl
  • BDD tests with built-in (Gherkin) Feature File recording, playback & reporting
  • testing capabilities
  • complete with drill-down details, execution statistics and multiple output formats
  • options with many ALM and Continuous Integration tools for executing and managing tests as well as a complete command-line interface

Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/squish/

Start Your Free Trial Today!
IBM Rational Functional Tester is an automated functional testing and regression testing tool. This software provides automated testing capabilities for functional, regression, GUI, and data-driven testing. Rational Function Tester supports a range of applications, such as web-based, .Net, Java, Siebel, SAP, terminal emulator-based applications, PowerBuilder, Ajax, Adobe Flex, Dojo Toolkit, GEF, Adobe PDF documents, zSeries, iSeries, and pSeries.
Offer
Learn more about froglogic Squish
Learn more about IBM Rational Functional Tester
Sample Customers
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson, ... Success Stories (Click Here)
Edumate
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider16%
Manufacturing Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Government10%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise42%
REVIEWERS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise38%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. froglogic Squish and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
540,984 professionals have used our research since 2012.

froglogic Squish is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while IBM Rational Functional Tester is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 3 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 8.0, while IBM Rational Functional Tester is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Rational Functional Tester writes "Good coverage and compatibility with excellent stability". froglogic Squish is most compared with Selenium HQ, SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and Tricentis Tosca, whereas IBM Rational Functional Tester is most compared with Selenium HQ, HCL OneTest, Micro Focus UFT One, Katalon Studio and Sauce Labs. See our IBM Rational Functional Tester vs. froglogic Squish report.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.