Compare Parasoft SOAtest vs. froglogic Squish

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
froglogic Squish Logo
6,618 views|3,275 comparisons
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
6,406 views|3,393 comparisons
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

More froglogic Squish Pros »

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros »

Cons
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

More froglogic Squish Cons »

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I think the licensing price is okay. I believe for one person, the cost is around 2,000 Euros. That's the initial cost, after that you buy support and it cost 800 Euros, which is much lower, It's a… more »
Top Answer: I'm not completely satisfied because although the ID is good, it could be improved with suggestions of names for some method, for example, or variable, or class. I'd like to see suggestions for… more »
Top Answer: We are customers of Froglogic and I'm an automation quality assurance engineer.
Top Answer: Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally.
Top Answer: From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly. Some aspects were difficult and therefore less useful for us, perhaps we lack the coding knowledge on that.
Top Answer: We are a large company based in India. The primary use case of this solution is for our REST architecture. Parasoft uses different languages like JSON, XML and SORBS. It's like an API testing tool and… more »
Ranking
16th
Views
6,618
Comparisons
3,275
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
8.0
18th
Views
6,406
Comparisons
3,393
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
458
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn More
Overview
Discover All Benefits (Click Here)

Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.

Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.

Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.

The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features

  • Desktop, Mobile, Embedded & Web Applications
  • include Qt, QtQuick, QML, Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, Mac, Tk, 4Js, iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java) and Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets.
  • testing on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, Unix. Mobile and Embedded testing on Android, iOS, embedded Linux and RTOSes such as QNX
  • Eclipse-based IDE
  • based object identification & Toolkit API Support
  • tests in your choice of Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby & Tcl
  • BDD tests with built-in (Gherkin) Feature File recording, playback & reporting
  • testing capabilities
  • complete with drill-down details, execution statistics and multiple output formats
  • options with many ALM and Continuous Integration tools for executing and managing tests as well as a complete command-line interface

Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/squish/

Start Your Free Trial Today!
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.
Offer
Learn more about froglogic Squish
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Sample Customers
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson, ... Success Stories (Click Here)
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company13%
Energy/Utilities Company4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise42%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise68%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: September 2021.
533,638 professionals have used our research since 2012.

froglogic Squish is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 18th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review. froglogic Squish is rated 8.0, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". froglogic Squish is most compared with Selenium HQ, SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SonarQube, Postman, Coverity, SoapUI Pro and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.