We performed a comparison between froglogic Squish and ReadyAPI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."
"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."
"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."
"The most valuable features are the integration with Jira and the test management tools."
"ReadyAPI's best features are that it's user-friendly and its behavior-driven development is flexible."
"The most valuable features of ReadyAPI are its robust functionality and collaboration capabilities."
"It has the ability to combine it with different CI/CD tools."
"The most valuable feature has been the assertion as a test step as this has allowed us to increase the scope of testing and validation."
"The interface is ok and they have the ability to re-load tests so that you can reuse them."
"It's easy to implement."
"The most valuable feature is being able to run each version for test suites."
"The price could be better."
"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."
"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."
"The solution is made up of multiple tools, and the one additional feature we'd like to have is load testing."
"Performance and memory management both need to be improved because other solutions use less memory for the same amount of data."
"It is challenging doing upgrades and patches because sometimes the environmental variables or suits in the projects get erased."
"Many users will consider this solution expensive compared to the layout. It is more expensive than other solutions."
"Areas for improvement include the security files, endpoints, and process sessions."
"The Property Transfer capability could be more user friendly because it is a bit difficult to understand."
"ReadyAPI could improve by adding a conversion tool from one file type to another. Import support for multiple file types would be beneficial."
"The performance in some cases needs improvement. Sometimes it requires too many resources."
froglogic Squish is ranked 11th in Test Automation Tools with 17 reviews while ReadyAPI is ranked 7th in Performance Testing Tools with 33 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 9.0, while ReadyAPI is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ReadyAPI writes "Allows you to parameterize in one place for the changes to reflect everywhere and lets you customize the environment, but its load testing feature needs improvement, and costs need to be cheaper". froglogic Squish is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Ranorex Studio, Eggplant Test, Katalon Studio and LEAPWORK, whereas ReadyAPI is most compared with Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, ReadyAPI Test, Tricentis Tosca and BlazeMeter. See our ReadyAPI vs. froglogic Squish report.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
