We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Sauce Labs vs. froglogic Squish

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
froglogic Squish Logo
6,249 views|3,275 comparisons
Sauce Labs Logo
5,121 views|3,675 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: November 2021.
555,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

More froglogic Squish Pros »

"So far, the stability has proven to be quite good.""As stated earlier we use Sauce Labs for a combination of automated testing and manual testing. Therefore the most useful features are the ability to run the functional automated tests via a Sauce Labs tunnels which allows access to applications in our internal network. The second most useful feature is the manual side.""Supplying devices to a testing team of possibly close to one thousand testers and developers is a great undertaking but Sauce Labs has made this very easy and a welcomed solution.""I have found the live test section with Sauce Labs to be extremely valuable. When you can't quite figure out why a test is failing, you can go to the live test results section within their tool and launch your test (specifying a given OS/browser, or device) manually and step through the test to see the issue more clearly, usually opening up the developer's tool console and watching the network calls and console (within Chrome) to usually find the underlying issue.""The insights section provides a great overall state of the automation suite and can identify trends relatively quickly. If we see a dip in our passing rate over time, we can look at what changed when the test started failing to find the root cause rather than doing a quick fix to find that the test fails a short time later.""The most valuable feature is the cross-browser feature, it has many android and iOS devices both simulators and real devices. It's easy to integrate. I also like video recording too.""Live device testing. As we all know, It's really hard and challenging to find/purchase many real devices to test because it will be costly and not all the team can be able to purchase all of the devices out there. We used to have a lot of real devices under our labs. However, it is really time-consuming to maintain those devices and make sure they are up to date with the testing requirements.""Sauce Lab analytics helped us to get detailed knowledge on test cases execution and logs."

More Sauce Labs Pros »

Cons
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

More froglogic Squish Cons »

"If I had to speak of an area that could be improved it would probably have to be the speed of interaction with the devices. There is at times a considerable amount of lag while using some of the virtual and at times even physical device farm""As a web product QA team, we sometimes need to spot check some new child site on multiple browsers and OS(es). It was a little time consuming for us since we need to click on each of the browser/OS combinations and start a new session to test. Every sprint, with new features and child pages being added, we mostly need to do the same steps over and over again.""The testing process is difficult. I need to prove the complete competency of the tool, and I am finding that challenging.""The only drawback is the speed, it will be good if we have a server in Asia too. It will be great if we can improve speed while initialization and execution.""Overall, I think Sauce Labs provides us with a valuable tool and resource. As far as what could be improved, I would say the overall test execution time. Some of the calls take a bit longer than I expect, for example in web browser tests; while the execution time isn't obnoxious, it could be improved so that overall tests/test suites finish faster.""Another feature that could still be improved on is more error clarity. Sometimes when running automated scripts the test will fail on the device side instead of the script and errors only show a 500 try again message instead of a detailed script that could of a been a timeout error from the code.""We have found that during automated testing this can be very slow. This causes inconsistencies with the tests. It's very difficult to rely on a service when you can't be sure if a test will pass or fail the next time it runs. This means building in a lot of sync time into the tests which in turn slows them down. If this speed could be improved then the service would be much better.""The one issue I have is the 14-day trial that a new user gets for free. I understand the concept of the trial period; however, I think this could be revamped to a free 30-minute run time every few months or after a significant update once the trial period has ended."

More Sauce Labs Cons »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
555,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I think the licensing price is okay. I believe for one person, the cost is around 2,000 Euros. That's the initial cost, after that you buy support and it cost 800 Euros, which is much lower, It's a… more »
Top Answer: I'm not completely satisfied because although the ID is good, it could be improved with suggestions of names for some method, for example, or variable, or class. I'd like to see suggestions for… more »
Top Answer: We are customers of Froglogic and I'm an automation quality assurance engineer.
Top Answer: So far, the stability has proven to be quite good.
Top Answer: The testing process is difficult. I need to prove the complete competency of the tool, and I am finding that challenging.
Top Answer: I am part of the QA team. I am implementing this solution. Right now, we are also trying to implement this solution in order to gather results in the testing process. We have several stores around the… more »
Ranking
16th
Views
6,249
Comparisons
3,275
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
8.0
7th
Views
5,121
Comparisons
3,675
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
563
Rating
8.4
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview
Discover All Benefits (Click Here)

Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.

Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.

Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.

The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features

  • Desktop, Mobile, Embedded & Web Applications
  • include Qt, QtQuick, QML, Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, Mac, Tk, 4Js, iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java) and Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets.
  • testing on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, Unix. Mobile and Embedded testing on Android, iOS, embedded Linux and RTOSes such as QNX
  • Eclipse-based IDE
  • based object identification & Toolkit API Support
  • tests in your choice of Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby & Tcl
  • BDD tests with built-in (Gherkin) Feature File recording, playback & reporting
  • testing capabilities
  • complete with drill-down details, execution statistics and multiple output formats
  • options with many ALM and Continuous Integration tools for executing and managing tests as well as a complete command-line interface

Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/squish/

Start Your Free Trial Today!

Sauce Labs provides the world's largest secure and highly scalable automation cloud for testing desktop, mobile web, native, and hybrid applications. Sauce Labs helps companies accelerate software development cycles, improve application quality, and deploy with confidence across 450+ browser/OS/device/platform combinations.

Offer
Learn more about froglogic Squish
Learn more about Sauce Labs
Sample Customers
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson, ... Success Stories (Click Here)
Salesforce.com, Mozilla, Zendesk, Puppet Labs, Twitter, Bank of America, Eventbrite, Bleacher Report, Okta, Intuit, Travelocity, Sharecare, CapitalOne.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company14%
Government5%
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company14%
Media Company12%
Marketing Services Firm9%
Retailer7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm9%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise42%
REVIEWERS
Small Business27%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise52%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise62%
Large Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, Worksoft and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: November 2021.
555,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.

froglogic Squish is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Sauce Labs is ranked 7th in Test Automation Tools with 10 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 8.0, while Sauce Labs is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sauce Labs writes "Helps us in reducing the number of manual testing". froglogic Squish is most compared with Ranorex Studio, Selenium HQ, SmartBear TestComplete, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and Katalon Studio, whereas Sauce Labs is most compared with BrowserStack, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, CrossBrowserTesting and Bitbar.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.