We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."
"The grids, as well as the selectors, are the most valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the Selenium grid, which allows us to run tests in parallel."
"We can run multiple projects at the same time and we can design both types of framework, including data-driven or hybrid. We have got a lot of flexibility here."
"The solution is free to use."
"There are many useful features in Selenium that I like, and of the new features I particularly enjoy the Selenium Grid. With this, we can run many test cases in one go, and in one suite we can extract multiple results."
"The most valuable features of Selenium HQ are it is open-source, has a good interface, and integrates well."
"The stability of the solution has been good, it is reliable we have not had any bugs."
"Selenium is the fastest tool compared to other competitors. It can run on any language, like Java, Python, C++, and .NET. So we can test any application on Selenium, whether it's mobile or desktop."
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."
"The stop control needs to be improved with a configuration tool to enable desktop support."
"Could have additional readability and abstraction."
"For now, I guess Selenium could add some other features like object communications for easy expansion."
"I would like to see XPath made more reliable so that it can be used in all browsers."
"For email-based applications, we can't automate as we would like to, making it necessary to bring in a third-party product to do so."
"There should be standardized frameworks to build automation."
"Selenium is good when the team is really technical because Selenium does less built-in methods. If it came with more built-in and pre-built methods it would be even easier for less technical people to work with it. That's where I think the improvement can be."
"It is not a licensed tool. The problem with that is that it won't be able to support Windows desktop applications. There is no support for Windows desktop applications. They can do something about it. Its user interface can also be improved, which is not great compared to the other latest tools. Anybody who has been working on functional testing or manual testing cannot directly work on Selenium HQ without learning programming skills, which is a disadvantage."
"We are satisfied with the pricing."
"Selenium is a free tool."
"It's an open-source tool that you can work with at any time without any cost."
"Selenium is open-source."
"This is an open-source product so there is no cost other than manpower."
"Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
"It is all free."
"Selenium is free software so we do not pay licensing costs."
Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.
The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features
Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/squish/Start Your Free Trial Today!
Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:
froglogic Squish is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Selenium HQ is ranked 3rd in Functional Testing Tools with 24 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 8.0, while Selenium HQ is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Highly customizable and the best tool out there to do automated testing". froglogic Squish is most compared with Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Tricentis Tosca and Micro Focus UFT One, whereas Selenium HQ is most compared with Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Worksoft Certify, Tricentis Tosca, Appium and Ranorex Studio. See our Selenium HQ vs. froglogic Squish report.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.