Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
"We would purchase more licenses right now if they were cheaper. Pricing is a little bit of a hindrance."
"It is expensive compared to some of the other automation tools in the market. However, the benefits and ROI has proved that it has been a good investment."
"The initial upfront cost in terms of licenses, plus all the money that we spent developing tests, has proven it's worth. Now, we can do a regression test suite in ten days as opposed to sixteen weeks."
"Our ROI is primarily a reduction in testing time. The testing, when we were doing it manually, was 30 to 40 percent of the project's cost."
"We ended up buying too many licenses. They were very good at selling it to us, and probably oversold it a little. We bought 45 licenses and have never used more than twenty. However, they gave us a pretty significant discount on the bigger license, so it made sense for us to buy enough that we wouldn't have to go back and ask for more."
"We could use Certify to do robotic process automation, which is basically running a process on your correction system instead of your test system. Therefore, we may do that in the future."
"By using automation, it reduced about 75 percent of the time when compared to any other tool."
"Saving money and better quality, these are the benefits of Certify."
Information Not Available
"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It does allow for good reusability. When it's designed properly and utilized properly, we can put things in a way that… more »
Top Answer: The licensing is yearly.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to.
Top Answer: The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies. When tests are recorded on to Silk Central, there is a… more »
Compared 32% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
|Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test|
|Worksoft is a leading global provider of automation software for high-velocity business process testing and discovery. Enterprises worldwide use Worksoft intelligent automation to innovate faster, lower technology risk, reduce costs, improve quality, and deeply understand their real end-to-end business processes. Global 5000 companies across all industries choose Worksoft for high speed process discovery and functional testing of digital, web, cloud, mobile, big data, and dozens of enterprise applications, including SAP, Oracle, and Salesforce.com.||Discover All Benefits (Click Here)
Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.
Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.
Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.
The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features
Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/squish/Start Your Free Trial Today!
|SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.|
Learn more about Worksoft Certify
Learn more about froglogic Squish
Learn more about Silk Test
|Kraft, Reliant Energy, Richemont, Applied Materials, Siemens PLM, Mosaic, Dow Corning, ebay, IBM, Accenture, Fortis BC, US Government, Southwest Airlines||Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson, ... Success Stories (Click Here)||Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies|
Consumer Goods Company13%
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider8%
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider12%
Computer Software Company40%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm11%
froglogic Squish is ranked 7th in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews while Silk Test is ranked 11th in Test Automation Tools with 5 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 9.4, while Silk Test is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "Test scripts can be created in multiple scripting languages and the execution can be automated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Silk Test writes "An easy to use interface with a recording feature that our business users are happy with". froglogic Squish is most compared with Automation Anywhere (AA), SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ and Ranorex Studio, whereas Silk Test is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus UFT One, Selenium HQ and Apache JMeter. See our Silk Test vs. froglogic Squish report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.