Frontegg vs OpenText Identity and Access Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Frontegg Logo
1,566 views|1,074 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Frontegg and OpenText Identity and Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, ForgeRock, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
1,566
Comparisons
1,074
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
21
Comparisons
19
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, ForgeRock, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Covisint Identity Platform, OpenText IAM
Learn More
Overview

Frontegg is a user management platform, designed for the Product-Led Growth (PLG) era. Frontegg provides blazing-fast integration of a powerful user infrastructure, designed to handle modern application use-cases.

Our platform supports app builders by covering all the way from fundamental authentication flows to the most advanced capabilities such as complex organizational structures (multi-tenancy), fine-grained authorization, API-token management, self-service admin portal for end-users, subscription enforcement, single-sign-on (SSO), and much more.

Frontegg’s interfaces are embedded as a UI layer within your app and becomes a customer-facing management interface for your end-users, both on the personal and workspace levels. Frontegg also powers-up your backend through rich SDKs supported in various languages and frameworks.

Pricing: Starts at $249/m

Enable enterprises to centrally manage the entire identity lifecycle of their internal and external users, as well as their access to resources across the enterprise.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Ally, BlueCross, BlueShield, Shell, BorgWarner, Carlson Wagonlit Travel, Cisco, Daimler, Delphi, Faurecia, Ford, GM, Hyundai, Jaguar Land Rover, Mitsubishi, On, Worthington Industries
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company13%
Government10%
Educational Organization6%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company16%
Financial Services Firm15%
Government7%
Construction Company6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business100%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise50%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise78%
Buyer's Guide
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, ForgeRock, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Frontegg is ranked 5th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) while OpenText Identity and Access Management is ranked 21st in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM). Frontegg is rated 9.6, while OpenText Identity and Access Management is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Frontegg writes "Intuitive with reCaptcha integration and helpful technical support". On the other hand, Frontegg is most compared with Auth0, Descope, Okta Customer Identity and Microsoft Entra ID, whereas OpenText Identity and Access Management is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Microsoft Entra ID and NetIQ Identity Governance.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.