Compare Frontline WAS vs. Spirent CyberFlood

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
71,039 views|38,259 comparisons
Frontline WAS Logo
29 views|13 comparisons
Spirent CyberFlood Logo
1,341 views|878 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security. Updated: April 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: My experience with Veracode across the board every time, in all products, the technology, the product, the service, and… more »
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Our customers use it to check for unauthorized file transfer.
Top Answer: It would be helpful to have other languages available. I would also like to see updates on a more frequent schedule.
Top Answer: We use Spirent CyberFlood for small, medium, and enterprise customers. But, we are now focusing more on large enterprise… more »
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Frontline Web Application Scanning
CyberFlood Virtual, Spirent Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing, Mu Dynamics Application Security Testing
Learn More
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Frontline WAS has been developed to provide the highest level of dynamic web application testing results through a system that is easily deployed and maintained. Enjoy the benefits of a technology you can trust to deliver unparalleled accuracy with minimal consumption of resources.

Spirent’s revolutionary CyberFlood security and application testing solution is now available as a virtual platform offering you simplified use, by consolidating multiple test functions into a completely virtual test environment.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Frontline WAS
Learn more about Spirent CyberFlood
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, Rekner
Information Not Available
Digicel
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm30%
Insurance Company10%
Computer Software Company10%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm9%
Manufacturing Company6%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider44%
Computer Software Company21%
Manufacturing Company11%
Media Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise48%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security. Updated: April 2021.
473,792 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Frontline WAS is ranked 42nd in Application Security while Spirent CyberFlood is ranked 26th in Application Security with 2 reviews. Frontline WAS is rated 0.0, while Spirent CyberFlood is rated 0.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spirent CyberFlood writes "Analyzes network security or even existing processes". Frontline WAS is most compared with , whereas Spirent CyberFlood is most compared with Ixia BreakingPoint, Ixia BreakingPoint VE, Synopsys Defensics and ImmuniWeb.

See our list of best Application Security vendors.

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.