FTI Harvester vs IBM eDiscovery Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
FTI Technology Logo
64 views|39 comparisons
IBM Logo
119 views|57 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FTI Harvester and IBM eDiscovery Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use FTI Harvester?
Ivan Castaneda
Ranking
28th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
64
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
25th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
119
Comparisons
57
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
eDiscovery Manager
Learn More
FTI Technology
Video Not Available
Overview
FTI Harvester is a patent-pending integrated technology and services offering that provides corporations with a quick, comprehensive ability to collect and preserve documents from SharePoint with confidence. Rather than a simplistic keyword search across a variety of internal SharePoint sites, FTI Harvester focuses on key custodians, ensuring a focused, streamlined collection. By working closely with the corporate legal team, FTI Harvester helps eliminate costly rework and unnecessary deduplication downstream by identifying the necessary documents for review and production as early and effectively as possible.
IBM eDiscovery Manager enables authorized IT and legal staff to search, cull, hold and export case-relevant content to manage electronically stored information (ESI). eDiscovery Manager helps you respond to discovery requests and Streamlines and standardizes the electronic discovery process. It Preserves the electronically stored information (ESI) evidence in a security-rich, auditable, high-scale, trusted evidence repository that includes chain-of-custody tracking and Enhances your capacity to organize ESI, email and other content to reduce discovery costs and risks.
Sample Customers
Canadian Competition Bureau
Hansgrohe
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FTI Harvester is ranked 28th in eDiscovery while IBM eDiscovery Manager is ranked 25th in eDiscovery. FTI Harvester is rated 0.0, while IBM eDiscovery Manager is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM eDiscovery Manager writes "Stable with administrative aspects and an easy to navigate backend". FTI Harvester is most compared with , whereas IBM eDiscovery Manager is most compared with .

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.