FTI Harvester vs IBM PSS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
FTI Technology Logo
64 views|39 comparisons
IBM Logo
89 views|68 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FTI Harvester and IBM PSS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
28th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
64
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
24th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
89
Comparisons
68
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
PSS
Learn More
FTI Technology
Video Not Available
Overview
FTI Harvester is a patent-pending integrated technology and services offering that provides corporations with a quick, comprehensive ability to collect and preserve documents from SharePoint with confidence. Rather than a simplistic keyword search across a variety of internal SharePoint sites, FTI Harvester focuses on key custodians, ensuring a focused, streamlined collection. By working closely with the corporate legal team, FTI Harvester helps eliminate costly rework and unnecessary deduplication downstream by identifying the necessary documents for review and production as early and effectively as possible.
IBM Atlas eDiscovery Process Management empowers attorneys, paralegals and discovery directors to manage rigorous, highly defensible legal workflows.
Sample Customers
Canadian Competition Bureau
LDB Group, RightShip, Tennessee Highway Patrol, Capgemini Consulting, TEAC Corporation, Ironside, nViso SA
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FTI Harvester is ranked 28th in eDiscovery while IBM PSS is ranked 24th in eDiscovery. FTI Harvester is rated 0.0, while IBM PSS is rated 0.0. On the other hand, FTI Harvester is most compared with , whereas IBM PSS is most compared with .

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.