FTI Harvester vs Smarsh eDiscovery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
FTI Technology Logo
64 views|39 comparisons
Smarsh Logo
172 views|120 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FTI Harvester and Smarsh eDiscovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery.
To learn more, read our detailed eDiscovery Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
28th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
64
Comparisons
39
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
19th
out of 40 in eDiscovery
Views
172
Comparisons
120
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Micro Focus eDiscovery, Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE Autonomy eDiscovery, HPE eDiscovery
Learn More
FTI Technology
Video Not Available
Overview
FTI Harvester is a patent-pending integrated technology and services offering that provides corporations with a quick, comprehensive ability to collect and preserve documents from SharePoint with confidence. Rather than a simplistic keyword search across a variety of internal SharePoint sites, FTI Harvester focuses on key custodians, ensuring a focused, streamlined collection. By working closely with the corporate legal team, FTI Harvester helps eliminate costly rework and unnecessary deduplication downstream by identifying the necessary documents for review and production as early and effectively as possible.

eDiscovery is a comprehensive, end-to-end eDiscovery platform that Operates. It Combines powerful analytical tools with core strengths in understanding human information, it presents a choice of document review options to match the right workflow to each unique matter and can be combined with other offerings. Discovery delivers broad coverage across data repositories and myriad data types, and is language independent to give you the fastest, most-complete solution on the market. eDiscovery helps corporations, law firms, and government entities prepare for, and react to, legal matters involving large amounts of data - without bias to repository or location. A pioneer in legal holds, early case assessment, and Technology-Assisted Review, eDiscovery helps you solve the full breadth of discovery and investigations challenges, from data collection through production. It covers the full spectrum of requirements, including Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), information management, preservation, processing, early case assessment (ECA), review and analysis, and production, allowing you to avoid the risk and cost of switching tools or vendors at different stages of discovery. eDiscovery is underpinned by our IDOL technology, which provides access to hundreds of data types and reaches across myriad data silos throughout the enterprise, this patented software also helps you understand human-generated (unstructured) information and administer data in place.

Sample Customers
Canadian Competition Bureau
Bank AlJazira, MTS India, Vodafone Ireland
Buyer's Guide
eDiscovery
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Commvault, Microsoft and others in eDiscovery. Updated: April 2024.
767,667 professionals have used our research since 2012.

FTI Harvester is ranked 28th in eDiscovery while Smarsh eDiscovery is ranked 19th in eDiscovery. FTI Harvester is rated 0.0, while Smarsh eDiscovery is rated 0.0. On the other hand, FTI Harvester is most compared with , whereas Smarsh eDiscovery is most compared with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery.

See our list of best eDiscovery vendors.

We monitor all eDiscovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.