Compare Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

Fudo PAM is ranked 10th in Privileged Access Management with 1 review while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 5th in Privileged Access Management with 9 reviews. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Flexible, intuitive, and easy to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "We are able to demonstrate what has happened on systems and who did what, but we want to be able to generate CSRs from the interface for certificates". Fudo PAM is most compared with CyberArk PAS, WALLIX BASTION and One Identity Safeguard, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk PAS, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and SailPoint IdentityIQ.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fudo PAM Logo
293 views|216 comparisons
One Identity Safeguard Logo
2,642 views|1,198 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Fudo PAM? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, ARCON, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: February 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector.

Read more »

All sessions are audited and they are indexed/searchable through the GUI.The solution's most valuable features are the efficiency and the quality of the recording.The way the solution is installed and deployed is very valuable. They make it very easy.The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly.The transparent mode for privileged sessions is a very good solution.It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage.The technical support is tremendous.The transparent mode for privileged sessions is one of the best thing for customers, because they don't see the system in-between.

Read more »

Cons
Professional training and certification would be great.

Read more »

Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service.I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated.Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support.On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight.The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another.The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems.For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy.We would like to be able to generate certificate signing requests (CSRs) from the interface for certificates.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible.Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
293
Comparisons
216
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
341
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
2,642
Comparisons
1,198
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
434
Avg. Rating
8.3
Top Comparisons
Compared 56% of the time.
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
Fudo Privileged Access Management
Learn
Fudo Security
One Identity
Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

One Identity Safeguard securely stores, manages, records and analyzes privileged accounts and access. It is an integrated solution that combines a secure hardened password safe and a session management and monitoring solution with threat detection and analytics.

Offer
Learn more about Fudo PAM
Securely store, manage, record and analyze privileged access

Prevent security breaches and limit damage by putting in place a privileged access management solution. Get a free 45-day trial, or request a demo of One Identity SafeGuard.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Cavium
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Financial Services Firm21%
Comms Service Provider20%
Construction Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, ARCON, Thycotic and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: February 2020.
397,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.