We performed a comparison between Fudo PAM and One Identity Safeguard based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"The solution transparently integrates into the infrastructure and users do not notice it. I would give this feature the highest rating."
"We don't need to use VPN for remote access."
"One Identity Safeguard is stable and provides great performance."
"Safeguard can define and update processes and procedures into the security framework of a company, including mobile. It allows us to change the policies and configurations on a mass scale in regards to security."
"The Transparent Mode is the number one advantage of the product."
"There are numerous valuable data protection features, including the content and information that offer us more scalable protection as needed."
"I have found One Identity Safeguard to be stable."
"I like the discovery functionality and the change password feature through the check-in. I also like the bulk import with the help of templates that come with it out of the box. With the help of these few features, my tasks are made easier."
"The stability is not very good."
"The configuration is difficult."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
"Professional training and certification would be great."
"The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems."
"Some of our users find the functionality a bit complex, and it could be made more user-friendly."
"The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another."
"It needs more marketing."
"Monitoring of the platform should be easier and more functional so that you can have a clear picture of the running service."
"One Identity Safeguard can improve by having more integration with multiple devices."
"There is a lack of documentation and many problems with the plugins."
"The deployment affects our privileged users because it takes a long time for them to request privileges, which impacts the SLA."
Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 5th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 38 reviews. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access". Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server, ManageEngine PAM360 and Teleport, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, WALLIX Bastion, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and ObserveIT. See our Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.