Compare Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fudo PAM Logo
910 views|605 comparisons
One Identity Safeguard Logo
4,330 views|1,612 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector.""it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company.""We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

More Fudo PAM Pros »

"The extensible framework for authentication is one of the most valuable features. We use an MFA plug-in and a lot of different factors, depending on what the business use-cases are. And of course, the auditing functionality is also valuable.""The transparent mode for privileged sessions is one of the best things for customers, because they don't see the system in-between.""The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests.""The transparent mode for privileged sessions is a very good solution.""It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage.""The technical support is tremendous.""The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly.""The way the solution is installed and deployed is very valuable. They make it very easy."

More One Identity Safeguard Pros »

Cons
"Professional training and certification would be great.""The configuration is difficult.""The stability is not very good."

More Fudo PAM Cons »

"Even though we have two nodes, there's no way to do an upgrade without taking everything completely offline. It would be nice if they could improve that.""For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy.""We would like to be able to generate certificate signing requests (CSRs) from the interface for certificates.""On a scale of one to ten, the stability is an eight.""The high availability function of the box requires a long time to switch over from one appliance to another.""The automated change of the passwords, which is now integrated, could be improved to be more flexible regarding different systems.""Our experience with technical support has been disappointing. We require more prompt and faster response times. We require answers to our questions right away but we haven't received that level of support.""I would like to see an adjustment with more enterprise architecture. You can buy multiple appliances but you can not fully separate different functions, so scaling might be a bit more complicated."

More One Identity Safeguard Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive.""Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis.""It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated.""They offer a fair price for a robust solution.""The full license is expensive but if you plan to use it in a big organization then it is the best option because it is more flexible.""It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody.""The pricing is about $80,000 per 100 servers. There are few elective costs.""We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

More One Identity Safeguard Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company.
Top Answer: Professional training and certification would be great. Regional support in Ukraine is lacking, although they are new and do not have many offices around the world. It would be helpful to have the… more »
Top Answer: We use this product to control access and to administer computers and servers in our company. We are a reseller. We have engineers who configure Fudo Privileged Access Management and deploy the… more »
Top Answer: There are a lot of features, so it's going to sound funny, but one of the most simplistic features, the Favorites feature, is the one we like the best. You do a full run-through of configuration to… more »
Top Answer: They offer a fair price for a robust solution. In addition to the standard licensing fees there are costs for Starling, but they're very minimal annually. You need Starling to use the mobile Approval… more »
Top Answer: There is room for improvement in the launch module. They built in a launch button but they don't have effective instructions for configuring it to allow it to launch an RDP session. They're working on… more »
Ranking
Views
910
Comparisons
605
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
464
Rating
8.0
Views
4,330
Comparisons
1,612
Reviews
16
Average Words per Review
1,060
Rating
8.4
Popular Comparisons
Compared 53% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
Fudo Privileged Access Management
Learn
Fudo Security
One Identity
Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

One Identity Safeguard securely stores, manages, records and analyzes privileged accounts and access. It is an integrated solution that combines a secure hardened password safe and a session management and monitoring solution with threat detection and analytics.

Offer
Learn more about Fudo PAM
Securely store, manage, record and analyze privileged access

Prevent security breaches and limit damage by putting in place a privileged access management solution. Get a free 45-day trial, or request a demo of One Identity SafeGuard.

Sample Customers
KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHLCavium
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider19%
Government7%
Financial Services Firm7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm60%
Healthcare Company20%
University10%
Manufacturing Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Comms Service Provider23%
Financial Services Firm13%
Manufacturing Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business32%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise45%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fudo PAM is ranked 7th in Privileged Access Management with 3 reviews while One Identity Safeguard is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management with 16 reviews. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Our research shows this is superior to competing products in some ways". On the other hand, the top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Improved our security posture by making password changes easy and allowing us to make regular password changes to service accounts". Fudo PAM is most compared with CyberArk PAS, WALLIX Bastion, Thycotic Secret Server and NetIQ Privileged Account Manager, whereas One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk PAS, WALLIX Bastion, Thycotic Secret Server, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Securonix Security Analytics. See our Fudo PAM vs. One Identity Safeguard report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.