Compare Fudo PAM vs. Osirium

Fudo PAM is ranked 8th in Privileged Access Management with 2 reviews while Osirium is ranked 16th in Privileged Access Management. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while Osirium is rated 0. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Flexible, intuitive, and easy to install". On the other hand, Fudo PAM is most compared with CyberArk PAS, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Osirium is most compared with CyberArk PAS and Thycotic Secret Server.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fudo PAM Logo
391 views|283 comparisons
Osirium Logo
79 views|55 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Osirium? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, ARCON and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: April 2020.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
391
Comparisons
283
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
300
Avg. Rating
8.0
Views
79
Comparisons
55
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 57% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 72% of the time.
Compared 28% of the time.
Also Known As
Fudo Privileged Access Management
Learn
Fudo Security
Osirium
Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Osirium protects organisations by securing and simplifying the complexities of privileged user management in multi-vendor infrastructures.

Offer
Learn more about Fudo PAM
Learn more about Osirium
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Mental Health Concern, M-Netics, NHS, Thinkmoney
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, ARCON and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: April 2020.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.