Compare Fudo PAM vs. Thycotic Secret Server

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fudo PAM Logo
1,010 views|669 comparisons
Thycotic Secret Server Logo
10,755 views|7,167 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. Thycotic Secret Server and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
466,017 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector.""it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company.""We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

More Fudo PAM Pros »

"The ability to give some groups access to different kind of databases with the storage of a password is the most valuable feature.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the random changing of passwords.""Provides us with the ability to control access [to secrets] by groups.""It offers the possibility of secure administration of hardware devices, as well as Linux systems administration from a Windows environment.""Ease of use because of its monolithic software.""The most valuable feature is session monitoring.""The user interface is quite good. It's very straightforward.""I find it really easy and computer confident, and the experience with the product is really good. Additionally, customizations are easy."

More Thycotic Secret Server Pros »

Cons
"Professional training and certification would be great.""The configuration is difficult.""The stability is not very good."

More Fudo PAM Cons »

"I don't know what kind of a cryptographic it uses to encrypt the password but it should be one of the stronger ones. Some of the cryptos have been accessed by hackers.""We could definitely use some help with API tokenization. If we had a way to store tokens that would be fabulous.""One of the things that we want is to be able to do some of the management of it using APIs.""I would like to see the shadowing of ongoing terminal sessions (Remote Desktop Mirroring).""Documentation could be improved if they were to include more about connectors. There is not enough documentation.""Having more detailed reporting would improve this solution.""There could be tweaks here and there. For example, instead of going to one main function to do this and another main function to do that, the solution could remap the user interface so that a person only has to go through one function. The way that function branches off should make a bit more sense.""There are some things that I know are really important to include like A/B version features which are available in Windows. I would say that they should be included in the road map."

More Thycotic Secret Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It isn't terribly expensive.""The price of this solution is good.""Pricing is comparable to competing products.""The pricing is standard in this business and we have no complaints about it.""Its price is okay. We don't compete on pricing. We seldom use price to win over our competitors. We prefer it this way because if we can sustain the price, we make more margin as well. We don't want the price to go down to the bottom where despite the win, there's no margin at all.""Secret Server is expensive when compared to the cost to some alternatives.""There are different plans and additional licensing costs that can be instituted for add-ons."

More Thycotic Secret Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
466,017 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpoint… more »
Top Answer: The GUI interface is well-designed and user-friendly.
Top Answer: I think the pricing of Thycotic and CyberArk products are very similar.
Ranking
Views
1,010
Comparisons
669
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
464
Rating
8.0
Views
10,755
Comparisons
7,167
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
452
Rating
8.2
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Fudo Privileged Access Management
Learn More
Overview

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Secret Server is a fully-featured Privileged Access Management (PAM) solution available both on premise and in the cloud. It empowers security and IT ops teams to secure and manage all types of privileged accounts and offers the fastest time to value of any PAM solution.

Offer
Learn more about Fudo PAM
Learn more about Thycotic Secret Server
Sample Customers
KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
Secure-24, University of San Diego, International Rescue Committee, San Francisco Ballet, Perkins Coie, University of San Diego, D.S.S. Limited, Turbo's Hoet, Eclipse Computing, Cathay Bank, Stellarise, J&R Consulting
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm11%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government5%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise31%
Large Enterprise38%
Find out what your peers are saying about Fudo PAM vs. Thycotic Secret Server and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
466,017 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fudo PAM is ranked 7th in Privileged Access Management with 3 reviews while Thycotic Secret Server is ranked 3rd in Privileged Access Management with 12 reviews. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while Thycotic Secret Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Our research shows this is superior to competing products in some ways". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thycotic Secret Server writes "Excellent access management that can serve very large networks". Fudo PAM is most compared with CyberArk PAS, One Identity Safeguard, WALLIX Bastion, NetIQ Privileged Account Manager and Symantec Privileged Access Manager, whereas Thycotic Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk PAS, HashiCorp Vault, Microsoft Azure Key Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management. See our Fudo PAM vs. Thycotic Secret Server report.

See our list of best Privileged Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.