Compare Fudo PAM vs. Thycotic Secret Server

Fudo PAM is ranked 8th in Privileged Access Management with 2 reviews while Thycotic Secret Server is ranked 4th in Privileged Access Management with 9 reviews. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while Thycotic Secret Server is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Flexible, intuitive, and easy to install". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thycotic Secret Server writes "Excellent access management that can serve very large networks". Fudo PAM is most compared with CyberArk PAS, WALLIX Bastion and One Identity Safeguard, whereas Thycotic Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk PAS, HashiCorp Vault and IBM Security Secret Server.
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, ARCON and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: April 2020.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company.Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector.

Read more »

The GUI interface is well-designed and user-friendly.I find it really easy and computer confident, and the experience with the product is really good. Additionally, customizations are easy.The user interface is quite good. It's very straightforward.The most valuable feature is session monitoring.Ease of use because of its monolithic software.It offers the possibility of secure administration of hardware devices, as well as Linux systems administration from a Windows environment.The most valuable feature of this solution is the random changing of passwords.Provides us with the ability to control access [to secrets] by groups.

Read more »

The configuration is difficult.Professional training and certification would be great.

Read more »

This product is excellent in every way except minor details in handling extremely large environments.There are some things that I know are really important to include like A/B version features which are available in Windows. I would say that they should be included in the road map.There could be tweaks here and there. For example, instead of going to one main function to do this and another main function to do that, the solution could remap the user interface so that a person only has to go through one function. The way that function branches off should make a bit more sense.Having more detailed reporting would improve this solution.Documentation could be improved if they were to include more about connectors. There is not enough documentation.I would like to see the shadowing of ongoing terminal sessions (Remote Desktop Mirroring).We could definitely use some help with API tokenization. If we had a way to store tokens that would be fabulous.One of the things that we want is to be able to do some of the management of it using APIs.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Pricing is comparable to competing products.The price of this solution is good.It isn't terribly expensive.

Read more »

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Average Words per Review
Avg. Rating
Top Comparisons
Compared 57% of the time.
Compared 20% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Also Known As
Fudo Privileged Access Management
Fudo Security

We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

Secret Server is the only fully featured Privileged Account Management (PAM) solution available both on premise and in the cloud. It empowers security and IT ops teams to secure and manage all types of privileged accounts and offers the fastest time to value of any PAM solution.

Learn more about Fudo PAM
Learn more about Thycotic Secret Server
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Secure-24, University of San Diego, International Rescue Committee, San Francisco Ballet, Perkins Coie, University of San Diego, D.S.S. Limited, Turbo's Hoet, Eclipse Computing, Cathay Bank, Stellarise, J&R Consulting
Top Industries
No Data Available
Software R&D Company34%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company10%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, One Identity, ARCON and others in Privileged Access Management. Updated: April 2020.
408,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.