• Home
  • Fujitsu CX1000 vs. Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL]

Fujitsu CX1000 vs Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu CX1000 and Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
218
Comparisons
200
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CX1000
BladeSymphony
Learn More
Fujitsu
Hitachi Vantara
Overview

PRIMERGY CX1000 is a new product category within the PRIMERGY x86 server family. Its focus is on providing large scale-out data centers with massive scaling x86 server power while at the same time delivering new data center economics for density, power, heat and acquisition costs.

PRIMERGY CX1000 delivers a cloud-enabled server infrastructure platform for internet scale-out data center (ISP), application service providers (ASP), managed domains, "as-a-service" providers, hosting industries, cloud computing and HPC markets.

BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers.

Sample Customers
TMC GmbH
BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbH
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu CX1000 is ranked 12th in Blade Servers while Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Fujitsu CX1000 is rated 0.0, while Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Fujitsu CX1000 is most compared with HPE NonStop and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series, whereas Hitachi BladeSymphony [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.