Fujitsu CX1000 vs. HPE Synergy Comparison

Fujitsu CX1000

HPE Synergy

Fujitsu CX1000

170 views|134 comparisons

HPE Synergy

Read 36 HPE Synergy reviews.

12,625 views|8,069 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Use Fujitsu CX1000? Share your opinion.

Rami Chiha

Operational database administrator at American University of Beirut Medical Center

Good uptime and performance, yet easy to manage with a user-friendly interface

The OneView installed on the Composers has a very friendly user interface, which helps to manage the compute modules in the frame, compared to... Read more »

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information Not Available

"The Nutanix platform came in a little more expensive than the Synergy.""The solution has reduced our IT infrastructure costs because we have had to buy less services than we used to.""In our whole environment, the cost is in the millions. On this particular chassis, the annual cost is 12 blades times approximately $40,000.""The biggest cost is the VMware licensing.""We do a biannual renewal. I know how much that renewal is, but I don't know how much it breaks down to be just Synergy, since we have our VMware, all of our physical equipment, etc. all rolled up into one renewal, which is a little over $300,000 every two years. However, only a subset of that is the Synergy product.""There was at least about a 20 percent savings in cost over our purchase based on the purchase price of the compute modules themselves versus what we've had to pay before. It was significantly less.""Synergy has lowered our total cost of ownership significantly. I would say ballpark around 25 percent, maybe more.""We bought everything outright to start with. We don't do much consumption-based stuff."

More HPE Synergy Pricing and Cost Advice »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 455,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
13th out of 23 in Blade Servers Views 170 Comparisons 134 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A	1st out of 23 in Blade Servers Views 12,625 Comparisons 8,069 Reviews 36 Average Words per Review 787 Rating 8.2
Popular Comparisons
Super Micro SuperBlade vs. Fujitsu CX1000 Compared 35% of the time. Cisco UCS B-Series vs. Fujitsu CX1000 Compared 33% of the time. See more Fujitsu CX1000 competitors » + Add more products to compare	HPE BladeSystem vs. HPE Synergy Compared 46% of the time. Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE Synergy Compared 19% of the time. Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE Synergy Compared 17% of the time. HPE Apollo vs. HPE Synergy Compared 5% of the time. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series vs. HPE Synergy Compared 0% of the time. See more HPE Synergy competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
CX1000
Learn
Fujitsu	Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Overview
PRIMERGY CX1000 is a new product category within the PRIMERGY x86 server family. Its focus is on providing large scale-out data centers with massive scaling x86 server power while at the same time delivering new data center economics for density, power, heat and acquisition costs. PRIMERGY CX1000 delivers a cloud-enabled server infrastructure platform for internet scale-out data center (ISP), application service providers (ASP), managed domains, "as-a-service" providers, hosting industries, cloud computing and HPC markets.	HPE Synergy, the first platform built from the ground up for Composable Infrastructure, offers an experience that empowers IT to create and deliver new value instantly and continuously. It is a single infrastructure that reduces operational complexity for traditional workloads and increases operational velocity for the new breed of applications and services. Through a single interface, HPE Synergy composes physical and virtual compute, storage, and fabric pools into any configuration for any application. As an extensible platform, it easily enables a broad range of applications and operational models such as virtualization, hybrid cloud, and DevOps. With HPE Synergy, IT can become not just the internal service provider but the business partner to rapidly launch new applications that become the business.
Offer
Learn more about Fujitsu CX1000 Learn More	Learn more about HPE Synergy Learn More
Sample Customers
TMC GmbH	HudsonAlpha, Virgin Media, EMIS, United
Top Industries
No Data Available	REVIEWERS Financial Services Firm17% Manufacturing Company14% Healthcare Company14% Retailer12% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company32% Comms Service Provider20% Government8% Energy/Utilities Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available	REVIEWERS Small Business24% Midsize Enterprise16% Large Enterprise60% VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business17% Midsize Enterprise12% Large Enterprise72%

Fujitsu CX1000 is ranked 13th in Blade Servers while HPE Synergy is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 36 reviews. Fujitsu CX1000 is rated 0.0, while HPE Synergy is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Synergy writes "We have gained some efficiencies on the provisioning front-end side, but there have been challenges with external integrations to other platforms". Fujitsu CX1000 is most compared with Super Micro SuperBlade and Cisco UCS B-Series, whereas HPE Synergy is most compared with HPE BladeSystem, Dell PowerEdge M, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Apollo and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Compare Fujitsu CX1000 vs. HPE Synergy