• Home
  • Fujitsu CX1000 vs. Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Fujitsu CX1000 vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fujitsu Logo

Fujitsu CX1000

218 views|200 comparisons
Lenovo Logo

Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL]

Read 11 Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu CX1000 and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fujitsu CX1000?
Anonymous User
Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment
Ranking
12th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
218
Comparisons
200
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CX1000
Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
Learn More
Fujitsu
Lenovo
Video Not Available
Overview

PRIMERGY CX1000 is a new product category within the PRIMERGY x86 server family. Its focus is on providing large scale-out data centers with massive scaling x86 server power while at the same time delivering new data center economics for density, power, heat and acquisition costs.

PRIMERGY CX1000 delivers a cloud-enabled server infrastructure platform for internet scale-out data center (ISP), application service providers (ASP), managed domains, "as-a-service" providers, hosting industries, cloud computing and HPC markets.

Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.
Sample Customers
TMC GmbH
Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise25%
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu CX1000 is ranked 12th in Blade Servers while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Fujitsu CX1000 is rated 0.0, while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] writes "Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment ". Fujitsu CX1000 is most compared with HPE NonStop and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series, whereas Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.