• Home
  • Fujitsu CX1000 vs. Oracle Netra Modular System

Fujitsu CX1000 vs Oracle Netra Modular System comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fujitsu Logo

Fujitsu CX1000

218 views|200 comparisons
Oracle Logo

Oracle Netra Modular System

Read 1 Oracle Netra Modular System review
34 views|19 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu CX1000 and Oracle Netra Modular System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fujitsu CX1000?
Anonymous User
It's not a one-size-fits-all converged infrastructure system, which means that I can mix things and have convergence...
There's a lot benefits with the Netra. First, since it is an agile system, I can mix hypervisors. For free, you're going to get Oracle VM, which is... Read more →
Ranking
12th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
218
Comparisons
200
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
22nd
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
34
Comparisons
19
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CX1000
Learn More
Fujitsu
Oracle
Overview

PRIMERGY CX1000 is a new product category within the PRIMERGY x86 server family. Its focus is on providing large scale-out data centers with massive scaling x86 server power while at the same time delivering new data center economics for density, power, heat and acquisition costs.

PRIMERGY CX1000 delivers a cloud-enabled server infrastructure platform for internet scale-out data center (ISP), application service providers (ASP), managed domains, "as-a-service" providers, hosting industries, cloud computing and HPC markets.

Oracle’s Netra Modular System is a transformative platform for customers looking to build out their communications on-premises and cloud infrastructures. With extreme agility and scale in a platform that can be completely virtualized, customers benefit from accelerated development, rapid bring up, and low-cost maintenance. Netra Modular System takes today’s traditional bladed and rackmount architectures and merges them to create a new innovative best-of-breed next-generation platform. This integrated system is designed to handle compute, networking, and storage evolution without forklift upgrades. Netra Modular System provides the service and business agility required in today’s fast-paced market. 

Sample Customers
TMC GmbH
Ovum
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
April 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu CX1000 is ranked 12th in Blade Servers while Oracle Netra Modular System is ranked 22nd in Blade Servers. Fujitsu CX1000 is rated 0.0, while Oracle Netra Modular System is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Netra Modular System writes "It's not a one-size-fits-all converged infrastructure system, which means that I can mix things and have convergence throughout the whole stack". Fujitsu CX1000 is most compared with HPE NonStop and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series, whereas Oracle Netra Modular System is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.