Fujitsu CX1000 vs SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu CX1000 and SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
12th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
217
Comparisons
199
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
CX1000
Rackable Systems
Learn More
Overview

PRIMERGY CX1000 is a new product category within the PRIMERGY x86 server family. Its focus is on providing large scale-out data centers with massive scaling x86 server power while at the same time delivering new data center economics for density, power, heat and acquisition costs.

PRIMERGY CX1000 delivers a cloud-enabled server infrastructure platform for internet scale-out data center (ISP), application service providers (ASP), managed domains, "as-a-service" providers, hosting industries, cloud computing and HPC markets.

SGI Rackable standard-depth, rackmount servers and clusters deliver top value and performance, based on the winning combination of the latest Intel processor architectures and SGI expertise in designing and delivering the most advanced performance computing systems available. Rackable servers support up to 1.5TB of memory per node in an ultra-dense architecture with up to 88 cores per 1U. Add to this support for FDR and EDR InfiniBand, 22-core processors and DDR4 memory, and you have some of the most powerful cluster solutions available.

Sample Customers
TMC GmbH
DownUnder GeoSolutions (DUG), Tagged
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu CX1000 is ranked 12th in Blade Servers while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Fujitsu CX1000 is rated 0.0, while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Fujitsu CX1000 is most compared with HPE NonStop and Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series, whereas SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.