Compare Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series vs. HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, NetApp and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: June 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"We paid for five years of support when we purchased the product.""The SSD is a little bit expensive.""This is not an expensive product but every time you add capacity to it, you need to pay for re-balancing.""Its price is a bit high for adding another tree, but when we purchased it, it was okay with us. We had compared it with EMC and other solutions, and it was okay at that point in time. Our storage has a lifespan of seven to eight years. When you purchase it, you need to keep a headroom of around 40% to 50%. After three to four years, you generally plan for an upgrade. The price is not so bad today for two years or so, and within a year, I might find that I have to upgrade or increase the storage. This usually happens when there is a radical change or a new application has come that is consuming a lot of data, but generally, there is a plan for the amount of data that we generate and the storage upgrade.""It is lower in price as compared to other vendors, such as Dell. As compared to Huawei, all storage solutions are expensive, including this one.""It is a bit more expensive. IBM is cheaper than HPE in Turkey.""This solution is expensive. We pay every year for support. It's a lump sum because we pay for data center support services, and everything is included in one.""The cost is reasonable given that the licensing is all included once you purchase it."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions are best for your needs.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I think that you need to meet the needs looking to the best fit to your environment. Looking into Hitachi Vantara portfolio, you will see entry level storage to enterprise. At my point of view… more »
Top Answer: I like that it's stable. This is the reason why we're using these products. We work in the broadcast market, and stability is very important. HPE has global services, and that's also important. Dell… more »
Top Answer: This product is a little bit costly, although this is because it is a high-quality product. There was a one-time cost when we procured this product and there are no monthly or yearly licensing fees.
Ranking
Views
411
Comparisons
353
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
19,463
Comparisons
14,523
Reviews
49
Average Words per Review
539
Rating
8.6
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
Eternus DX400 series
HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage
Learn More
Overview

The Fujitsu Storage ETERNUS DX series aligns storage resources with business priorities, thus enabling higher system utilization and delivering increased system consolidation capabilities and a faster ROI. ETERNUS SF provides enterprise-class functionalities in the entry and midrange class and allows flexible disaster recovery and business continuity concepts for the different model sizes, thus decreasing investment costs.

HP 3PAR all-flash storage accelerates business agility by boosting application performance with over 900,000 IOPS at less than 0.7 ms latency. And it does this while delivering all the enterprise-class, Tier-1 features and functionality you expect from the storage platform that powers three of the world’s four largest managed service providers.

Offer
Learn more about Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series
Learn more about HPE 3PAR StoreServ
Sample Customers
DDOR Novi Sad
Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider43%
Computer Software Company11%
Retailer7%
Educational Organization7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Healthcare Company10%
Manufacturing Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider25%
Government6%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise57%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, NetApp and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: June 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is ranked 11th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while HPE 3PAR StoreServ is ranked 1st in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 27 reviews. Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is rated 0.0, while HPE 3PAR StoreServ is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE 3PAR StoreServ writes "Robust and easy to use with a simple setup ". Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is most compared with HPE StorageWorks MSA, IBM FlashSystem and NetApp FAS Series, whereas HPE 3PAR StoreServ is most compared with HPE Primera, Dell EMC Unity XT, HPE Nimble Storage, NetApp AFF (All Flash FAS) and IBM FlashSystem.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.