Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series vs Nexsan BEAST comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series and Nexsan BEAST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network).
To learn more, read our detailed Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
255
Comparisons
221
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
178
Comparisons
140
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Eternus DX400 series
BEAST, Nexsan SASBeast, SASBeast, Nexsan DATABeast, Nexsan SATABeast, Nexsan SATABeast Xi, SATABeast Xi
Learn More
Overview

The Fujitsu Storage ETERNUS DX series aligns storage resources with business priorities, thus enabling higher system utilization and delivering increased system consolidation capabilities and a faster ROI. ETERNUS SF provides enterprise-class functionalities in the entry and midrange class and allows flexible disaster recovery and business continuity concepts for the different model sizes, thus decreasing investment costs.

Nexsan SASBeast is a high-capacity, high-performance, enterprise-class storage array system ideal for transactional applications that demand high I/O per second. With its storage density of 25.2TB offered in a 4U configuration, SASBeast has the ability to scale to hundreds of terabytes of capacity in a single rack. With 42 high-speed SAS drives, it's optimized for customers whose infrastructures support Microsoft Exchange, Oracle, SQL and other databases, as well as those that involve large file servers, virtual server environments or large amounts of small files. Equally important, SASBeast includes FC and iSCSI connectivity and allows customers to combine SAS, SSD and SATA drives within the same system to address different application requirements.

Sample Customers
DDOR Novi Sad
Clark Enersen Partners
Buyer's Guide
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is ranked 11th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) while Nexsan BEAST is ranked 12th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is rated 0.0, while Nexsan BEAST is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Fujitsu Eternus DX400 series is most compared with HPE StorageWorks MSA and NetApp FAS Series, whereas Nexsan BEAST is most compared with HPE 3PAR StoreServ.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.