Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series vs HPE BladeSystem comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fujitsu Logo
227 views|155 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
3,782 views|2,784 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series and HPE BladeSystem based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability.""Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."

More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pros →

"They have served different needs for us from virtualized web servers to dedicated databases and application servers.""The product is quite stable. Its performance is reliable.""The solution is very easy to use.""The most valuable feature of HPE BladeSystem is its upgradability and centralized configuration.""The solution is issue-free and works almost flawlessly.""The technical support is good.""The most valuable feature of the HPE BladeSystem is the ease of management and the robust design.""Cabling complexity and volume have been reduced."

More HPE BladeSystem Pros →

Cons
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers.""The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."

More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Cons →

"There could be more management capability to work with integrations.""There have been some hardware failures with them. These failures have since been solved by HPE support partners.""They should provide open learning materials and seminars for detailed knowledge of the product.""They are not selling BladeSystem anymore. The end of the sale of this platform was this year, 2020.""It will be discontinued so we will have to change to another product shortly.""I would like to see the upgrade path a little bit smoother.""It would be nice if the solution were cheaper.""There is always room for improvement everywhere with the HPE BladeSystem."

More HPE BladeSystem Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There are special licenses that are connected to the usage. We installed Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series for a high PC solution, and for this reason, some Microsoft licenses and other special licenses were embedded or bundled to the Fujitsu solution."
  • "No license is required to operate the product."
  • More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Their licensing program is pretty simple."
  • "With regards to the prices, they need to adapt to the current needs of the country."
  • "The prices for the HPE Virtual Connect Modules are expensive compared to other I/O Modules available."
  • "Add OneView and ILO advanced to the base product. Don’t adjust the price, but just include them."
  • "​The price could be cheaper."
  • "The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000."
  • "It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."
  • "It is expensive. There are no additional costs. We are able to get good discounts anyway from HPE, but if the price can come down, we'll be happy."
  • More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability.
    Top Answer:No license is required to operate the product. Licenses are meant for products like VMware.
    Top Answer:The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series should be made easier.
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    Top Answer:The solution is scalable, offering flexibility and expansion options to meet changing business needs.
    Ranking
    13th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    227
    Comparisons
    155
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    2nd
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,782
    Comparisons
    2,784
    Reviews
    19
    Average Words per Review
    409
    Rating
    8.9
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
    Learn More
    Overview

    Managing large computing and storage requirements with limited resources, budgets and space is a challenge. The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX400 helps to solve it. It is a fully-featured blade system built from the ground up as a user-friendly and versatile IT infrastructure. Up to eight server and storage blades are all packed into a surprisingly small enclosure that is as easy to install and manage as it is to use.

    HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.
    Sample Customers
    Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Tokyo Stock Exchange, RAF St. Mawgan, King Fahad Medical City, St. Bede’s Catholic High School, 
    EMIS Health
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise61%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 13th in Blade Servers with 3 reviews while HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 134 reviews. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 8.0, while HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Very reliable, expands well, and is pretty simple to set up". Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with Fujitsu CX1000 and Super Micro SuperBlade, whereas HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, Dell PowerEdge M, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Superdome X.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.