We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series and PowerEdge C based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers."Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
"One of the main features that attract customers to buy their products is the great management tool and almost zero failure rate, making it easy to use."
"The scalability of the product is good since it offers high performance and capacity."
"The product has high performance and no downtime."
"The performance is good."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The security of the product is very good."
"The initial setup is not complex. It's a user-friendly tool."
"I like the feature that allows for a backup and that is suitable for me."
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."
"The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series was complex."
"It would be better if it worked with SMTP servers on the cloud. Right now, it only allows notifications via the SMTP server. In the next release, I would like to have a better processor."
"There has been an increase in quality issues."
"Its customer service could be better."
"An area where the product lacks and needs to consider improvement is by allowing it to integrate with some AI tool for monitoring."
"The need to update the firmware and check if there is any bug in the product is one of the areas where Dell PowerEdge C falls short and needs to make improvements."
"A feature that needs to be added is the ability for full container storage."
"It should be improved in terms of future expansion. We should be able to have additional free slots for future extensions in terms of memory."
"We had a few minor issues with compatibility on the latest version during the installation process."
More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice →
Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 13th in Blade Servers with 3 reviews while PowerEdge C is ranked 5th in Blade Servers with 23 reviews. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 8.0, while PowerEdge C is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PowerEdge C writes "Easy to deploy and has high performance and no downtime". Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with Fujitsu CX1000, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Synergy, whereas PowerEdge C is most compared with Huawei FusionServer X Series, HPE Apollo, Dell PowerEdge M and Cisco UCS B-Series.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
