We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series vs. PowerEdge C

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors."

More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pros »

"The management platform is great.""The security of the product is very good.""I have found the compression capability the most valuable feature.""The scalability of the solution met our needs."

More PowerEdge C Pros »

Cons
"It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would be nice for providing different solutions for the customers."

More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Cons »

"The VxRail should be opened to allow other virtualization platforms to be used.""We had a few minor issues with compatibility on the latest version during the installation process.""A feature that needs to be added is the ability for full container storage.""There could be some more ports added in the future."

More PowerEdge C Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There are special licenses that are connected to the usage. We installed Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series for a high PC solution, and for this reason, some Microsoft licenses and other special licenses were embedded or bundled to the Fujitsu solution."

More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice »

"PowerEdge C is very expensive, but personally, I think it's worth the price.""The price of the solution is reasonable."

More PowerEdge C Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
543,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series has two processors.
Top Answer: There are special licenses that are connected to the usage. We installed Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series for a high PC solution, and for this reason, some Microsoft licenses and other special licenses… more »
Top Answer: It can have more automation. In addition, Fujitsu should have a broader portfolio, not specifically in terms of the service solutions, but more in terms of the big picture. A broader portfolio would… more »
Top Answer: The scalability of the solution met our needs.
Top Answer: There could be some more ports added in the future.
Ranking
12th
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
96
Comparisons
47
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
342
Rating
N/A
6th
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
449
Comparisons
349
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
219
Rating
8.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Managing large computing and storage requirements with limited resources, budgets and space is a challenge. The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX400 helps to solve it. It is a fully-featured blade system built from the ground up as a user-friendly and versatile IT infrastructure. Up to eight server and storage blades are all packed into a surprisingly small enclosure that is as easy to install and manage as it is to use.

PowerEdge C help you to maximize hyperscale performance with up to 4 independent server nodes, flexible storage and shared infrastructure in a compact 2U chassis.

Offer
Learn more about Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series
Learn more about PowerEdge C
Sample Customers
Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Tokyo Stock Exchange, RAF St. Mawgan, King Fahad Medical City, St. Bede’s Catholic High School, 
NxtGen Datacenter, Medien-Service Untermain (MSU), Exasol, IndigoVision, Dayco
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Comms Service Provider22%
Manufacturing Company5%
Insurance Company5%
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: October 2021.
543,089 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 12th in Blade Servers with 1 review while PowerEdge C is ranked 6th in Blade Servers with 4 reviews. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 0.0, while PowerEdge C is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "Stable, easy to set up, and has two processors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PowerEdge C writes "Easy to use with good security and good pricing". Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with HPE Synergy, whereas PowerEdge C is most compared with HPE Apollo and HPE Moonshot.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.