Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series vs SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series and SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use SGI Rackable Systems [EOL]?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There are special licenses that are connected to the usage. We installed Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series for a high PC solution, and for this reason, some Microsoft licenses and other special licenses were embedded or bundled to the Fujitsu solution."
  • "No license is required to operate the product."
  • More Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability.
    Top Answer:No license is required to operate the product. Licenses are meant for products like VMware.
    Top Answer:The initial setup of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series should be made easier.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    13th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    227
    Comparisons
    155
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Blade Servers
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rackable Systems
    Learn More
    Overview

    Managing large computing and storage requirements with limited resources, budgets and space is a challenge. The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX400 helps to solve it. It is a fully-featured blade system built from the ground up as a user-friendly and versatile IT infrastructure. Up to eight server and storage blades are all packed into a surprisingly small enclosure that is as easy to install and manage as it is to use.

    SGI Rackable standard-depth, rackmount servers and clusters deliver top value and performance, based on the winning combination of the latest Intel processor architectures and SGI expertise in designing and delivering the most advanced performance computing systems available. Rackable servers support up to 1.5TB of memory per node in an ultra-dense architecture with up to 88 cores per 1U. Add to this support for FDR and EDR InfiniBand, 22-core processors and DDR4 memory, and you have some of the most powerful cluster solutions available.

    Sample Customers
    Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Tokyo Stock Exchange, RAF St. Mawgan, King Fahad Medical City, St. Bede’s Catholic High School, 
    DownUnder GeoSolutions (DUG), Tagged
    Buyer's Guide
    Blade Servers
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: April 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is ranked 13th in Blade Servers with 3 reviews while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is rated 8.0, while SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series writes "A highly stable solution with technical support that is not only good but also always available to help the product's users". On the other hand, Fujitsu Primergy BX400 Series is most compared with Fujitsu CX1000, Super Micro SuperBlade and HPE Synergy, whereas SGI Rackable Systems [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.