Compare Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs. Hitachi BladeSymphony
Ranking  | |
Views 472 Comparisons 407 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A | Views 103 Comparisons 67 Reviews 0 Average Words per Review 0 Rating N/A |
 Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: January 2021. 456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 84% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. | Compared 100% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| Primergy BX900 Series | BladeSymphony |
Learn | |
| Fujitsu | Hitachi |
Overview | |
The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX900 S2 chassis is the rock-solid foundation for Fujitsu's blade ecosystem, providing a reliable, flexible and efficient platform for building a converged infrastructure. The system provides a modular approach to create an IT infrastructure. The chassis includes all needed infrastructure elements such as power supplies and fans, networking, and management. The Fujitsu blade server is easy to upgrade, maintain and customize. Inside, you can mix and match almost any combination of server storage and connection blades to run your choice of operation systems and applications. | BladeSymphony blade servers inherit its core design from Hitachi's line of highly reliable mainframe platforms bound together by a robust management software solution. BladeSymphony management solutions simplify the administration and management of BladeSymphony servers in enterprise data centers. BladeSymphony 1000 blade systems also supports Multi-Blade Symmetric Multi Processing (SMP) interconnect technology for scalable performance. Transaction recovery is supported with our N+M standby feature improving system reliability and availability. High performance and high availability features allow BladeSymphony to be utilized in small departmental office environments to large back-end enterprise data centers. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series | Learn more about Hitachi BladeSymphony |
Sample Customers | |
| Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International(ATR), Yamagata University, Universiti Putra Malaysia, China Telecom, Badan Informasi Geospasial | BMW, LBBW Asset Management, Mutual and Federal, National Computing and Information Agency, Perth Radiological Clinic, Shaanxi Telecom, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE), Swisscom IT Services, Turkcell, University HealthSystem Consortium, VPS - Norwegian Central Securities, W&W Informatik GmbH |
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell EMC and others in Blade Servers. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is ranked 11th in Blade Servers while Hitachi BladeSymphony is ranked 15th in Blade Servers. Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is rated 0.0, while Hitachi BladeSymphony is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M, Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE BladeSystem, whereas Hitachi BladeSymphony is most compared with HPE BladeSystem.
See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.