Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series and Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers.
To learn more, read our detailed Blade Servers Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series?
Anonymous User
Ranking
14th
out of 22 in Blade Servers
Views
170
Comparisons
138
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Blade Servers
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Primergy BX900 Series
Blade Servers, IBM Blade Servers, x86 BladeServers
Learn More
Lenovo
Video Not Available
Overview

The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX900 S2 chassis is the rock-solid foundation for Fujitsu's blade ecosystem, providing a reliable, flexible and efficient platform for building a converged infrastructure. The system provides a modular approach to create an IT infrastructure. The chassis includes all needed infrastructure elements such as power supplies and fans, networking, and management. The Fujitsu blade server is easy to upgrade, maintain and customize. Inside, you can mix and match almost any combination of server storage and connection blades to run your choice of operation systems and applications.

Regarding Blade Servers, IBM is a pioneer in blade technology, building the legendary IBM reliability, security and performance into the efficient, flexible blade form factor. IBM continues to drive innovation in blade servers, offering a range of technologies to support the unique demands of your business Ð large or small, in virtually any industry.
Sample Customers
Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International(ATR), Yamagata University, Universiti Putra Malaysia, China Telecom, Badan Informasi Geospasial
Merkl IT, Sanitas, Cnam, Generac Power, DIMAR Group, Comune di Messina
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise25%
Buyer's Guide
Blade Servers
March 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Cisco, Dell Technologies and others in Blade Servers. Updated: March 2024.
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is ranked 14th in Blade Servers while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Blade Servers. Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is rated 0.0, while Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] writes "Meets rigorus challenges however requires fair amount invesment ". Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M, whereas Lenovo Blade Servers [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.