Fujitsu SAP Services vs Talenica comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fujitsu Logo
95 views|70 comparisons
TYCONZ Logo
25 views|8 comparisons
Ranking
12th
Views
95
Comparisons
70
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
28th
Views
25
Comparisons
8
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Comparisons
Learn More
TYCONZ
Video Not Available
Overview

Fujitsu offers a complete range of tailored, future-proof SAP services that help customers simplify, innovate and grow. Fujitsu drives innovation across all areas of financial and operational performance - from cloud services via managed SAP operations to solutions and services for on-premise deployments.

Talenica ensures accurate on-time payrolls, third-party payments, tax reporting, and accounting data for all supported countries and regions. It consolidates all payroll processes in a single, localized platform with integration to finance and connectivity with regional outsourcing partners as needed.

You can:

Consolidate core HR and payroll operations without disrupting business and HR operations.
Manage payroll in house with the security, scalability, flexibility, and ease you expect from the cloud.
Help ensure employees are paid accurately and on time, even as you expand to overseas markets.

Sample Customers
Frucor Beverages Ltd
Jaguar Land Rover, Qatar Chemical Company, ABK Eahli, Azadea, Saudia Cargo, Al Mawarid Bank

Fujitsu SAP Services is ranked 12th in SAP Service Providers while Talenica is ranked 28th in SAP Service Providers. Fujitsu SAP Services is rated 0.0, while Talenica is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Fujitsu SAP Services is most compared with , whereas Talenica is most compared with .

See our list of best SAP Service Providers vendors.

We monitor all SAP Service Providers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.