Fusion Framework System vs STG Active Risk Manager comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fusion Framework System and STG Active Risk Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC.
To learn more, read our detailed GRC Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:Here are some of the pros and cons of Fusion Risk Management and MetricStream for Operational Resilience and Business Continuity Fusion Risk Management Pros: Fusion Risk Management is an… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
31st
out of 86 in GRC
Views
312
Comparisons
148
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
36th
out of 86 in GRC
Views
146
Comparisons
134
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
Strategic Thought
Learn More
Overview

Fusion helps your company prepare, manage, and act in any situation with our unique combination of consulting services and software solutions, including our award-winning software, the Fusion Framework System.

The Fusion Framework creates tailored and engaging experiences for all contributors, automates much of the administration workload, and establishes an information foundation that can be used to make better decisions. Check out how Fusion can redefine your business continuity, disaster recovery, and risk management programs.

Active Risk Manager (ARM) solution can collect all risk data from anywhere in an organization, compiling it into one centralized system. ARM is the system of record for all risk-related information within an organization, putting high quality, real-time governance and compliance data at the fingertips of executives and risk managers - without reliance on a patchwork of systems or spreadsheets. If a risk is identified, response plans and fallbacks can be instantly accessible to all through ARM, the enterprise-wide, web-based system.

Sample Customers
Aureon, ETS, Discount Tire, Box,
EADS, Eurocopter, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Educational Organization40%
Financial Services Firm19%
Manufacturing Company8%
Healthcare Company6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise54%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
GRC
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Fusion Framework System is ranked 31st in GRC while STG Active Risk Manager is ranked 36th in GRC. Fusion Framework System is rated 0.0, while STG Active Risk Manager is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Fusion Framework System is most compared with RSA Archer, whereas STG Active Risk Manager is most compared with .

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.