We performed a comparison between Galen Framework and Inflectra Rapise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."
"It's pretty straightforward to set up."
"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."
"There don't seem to be functions available for automatically generating Galen values based on the specifications in the spec file, and this could be a potential improvement for Galen Framework."
"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."
"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."
Galen Framework is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Inflectra Rapise is ranked 22nd in Test Automation Tools with 7 reviews. Galen Framework is rated 8.6, while Inflectra Rapise is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Galen Framework writes "Scalable with strong reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inflectra Rapise writes "The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product". Galen Framework is most compared with Selenium HQ, whereas Inflectra Rapise is most compared with Katalon Studio and Selenium HQ.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.