Galen Framework vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Galen Framework Logo
268 views|111 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
views| comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Galen Framework and Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature.
Top Answer:Galen Framework does not have any additional costs after the product is purchased.
Top Answer:I haven't found any specific areas for modernization or improvement in Galen Framework yet. However, one observation I have made is about the auto-generation of Galen files. While this feature exists… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
24th
Views
268
Comparisons
111
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
376
Rating
8.0
Unranked
In Functional Testing Tools
Comparisons
Also Known As
Service Test, HPE Service Test
Learn More
Galen Framework
Video Not Available
Overview

Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.

Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.

Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.

Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm15%
Energy/Utilities Company12%
Computer Software Company12%
Healthcare Company10%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise78%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
768,415 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Galen Framework is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Functional Testing Tools. Galen Framework is rated 8.6, while Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Galen Framework writes "Scalable with strong reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] writes "We've been able to automate several MAT test runs day and night". Galen Framework is most compared with , whereas Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.