Galen Framework vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Galen Framework Logo
268 views|111 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
1,461 views|870 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Galen Framework and Oracle Application Testing Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature."

More Galen Framework Pros →

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature.""Has good automation and load-testing capabilities.""The solution is scalable.""The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts.""The function test feature is valuable.""User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps.""I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool""We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pros →

Cons
"There don't seem to be functions available for automatically generating Galen values based on the specifications in the spec file, and this could be a potential improvement for Galen Framework."

More Galen Framework Cons →

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck.""I have faced issues with some indexing items.""To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing.""The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly.""We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules.""It needs to be compatible with all browsers.""Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment.""Licensing policies could be more intuitive."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."
  • "There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
  • "The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."
  • "Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."
  • "The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."
  • More Oracle Application Testing Suite Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature.
    Top Answer:Galen Framework does not have any additional costs after the product is purchased.
    Top Answer:I haven't found any specific areas for modernization or improvement in Galen Framework yet. However, one observation I have made is about the auto-generation of Galen files. While this feature exists… more »
    Top Answer:We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users.
    Top Answer:The speed of setup and deployment of this solution is based on the size and complexity of the organization implementing it. Depending on the size and complexity of the organization, this could take a… more »
    Top Answer:We would like to see the instruction documentation made into video or audio formats, to help new users get used to the modules. We would also like the customization of reports within the solution to… more »
    Ranking
    24th
    Views
    268
    Comparisons
    111
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    376
    Rating
    8.0
    13th
    Views
    1,461
    Comparisons
    870
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    674
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OATS
    Learn More
    Galen Framework
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Layout testing seemed always a complex task. Galen Framework offers a simple solution: test location of objects relatively to each other on page. Using a special syntax and comprehensive rules you can describe any layout you can imagine.

    Galen Framework runs well in Selenium Grid. You can set up your tests to run in a cloud like Sauce Labs or BrowserStack so that you can even test your responsive websites on different mobile devices. Galen can run multiple tests in parallel which is also a nice time saver.

    Galen Framework is designed with responsivness in mind. It is easy to set up a test for different browser sizes. Galen just opens a browser, resizes it to a defined size and then tests the page according to specifications.

    Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Energy/Utilities Company11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Healthcare Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government11%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise78%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    767,847 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Galen Framework is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Oracle Application Testing Suite is ranked 13th in Functional Testing Tools with 24 reviews. Galen Framework is rated 8.6, while Oracle Application Testing Suite is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Galen Framework writes "Scalable with strong reporting capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Application Testing Suite writes "Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy". Galen Framework is most compared with , whereas Oracle Application Testing Suite is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, OpenText UFT One, Katalon Studio, Apache JMeter and OpenText LoadRunner Cloud.

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.