We performed a comparison between Bitbar and Galen Framework based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"Ability to use different frameworks."
"What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"There don't seem to be functions available for automatically generating Galen values based on the specifications in the spec file, and this could be a potential improvement for Galen Framework."
Earn 20 points
Bitbar is ranked 26th in Functional Testing Tools while Galen Framework is ranked 24th in Functional Testing Tools with 2 reviews. Bitbar is rated 7.0, while Galen Framework is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "It's helped me when I've been short of devices and want to test whether the application will work on a specific device or not". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Galen Framework writes "Scalable with strong reporting capabilities". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, SmartBear TestComplete, CrossBrowserTesting, Sauce Labs and LambdaTest, whereas Galen Framework is most compared with .
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.