Galvanize HighBond vs Microsoft Secure Score comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Galvanize Logo
219 views|132 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
517 views|386 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Galvanize HighBond and Microsoft Secure Score based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Vendor Risk Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
WillWillis
Karim Zaki
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is automation."

More Galvanize HighBond Pros →

"Microsoft Secure Score's most valuable feature is identity."

More Microsoft Secure Score Pros →

Cons
"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."

More Galvanize HighBond Cons →

"They could indicate whether a recommendation aligns with different compliance standards."

More Microsoft Secure Score Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I give the cost of the solution a six out of ten."
  • More Galvanize HighBond Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is automation.
    Top Answer:Regarding pricing, we are located in Africa where economic instability prevails and our currency continues to lose value due to inflation. The cost of the solution is high. I give the cost of the… more »
    Top Answer:The report model was our main concern. I believe currently the solution uses a third party for the reporting. As part of a consulting firm, one of the challenges we face is the difficulty in producing… more »
    Top Answer:Microsoft Secure Score's most valuable feature is identity.
    Top Answer:Microsoft Secure Score's user interface and export feature need improvement. We are not able to export the overall security score at the moment. I have to use PowerShare in the background to encounter… more »
    Ranking
    12th
    Views
    219
    Comparisons
    132
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    517
    Comparisons
    386
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    355
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Rsam GRC, HighBond, HighBond by Galvanize
    MS Secure Score
    Learn More
    Overview
    Your GRC program is unique to your organization - and Rsam thinks it should stay that way. We give you control over what modules you want to implement and in what order. Deploy an out-of-the-box, turnkey baseline configuration that addresses your most urgent use case within 30 days and iterate from there. With Rsam, you can also easily customize the baseline configuration to meet your own unique needs. Iterate each step of the way until you reach 100% of your requirements. This keeps your implementation manageable and moving forward.

    Introduction to secure score
    Azure Security Center has two main goals:

    to help you understand your current security situation
    to help you efficiently and effectively improve your security
    The central feature in Security Center that enables you to achieve those goals is secure score.

    Security Center continually assesses your resources, subscriptions, and organization for security issues. It then aggregates all the findings into a single score so that you can tell, at a glance, your current security situation: the higher the score, the lower the identified risk level.

    Sample Customers
    CNA Insurance
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization43%
    Government8%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Computer Software Company5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Insurance Company9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise48%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Vendor Risk Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management. Updated: March 2024.
    768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Galvanize HighBond is ranked 12th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 3 reviews while Microsoft Secure Score is ranked 6th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 1 review. Galvanize HighBond is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Secure Score is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Galvanize HighBond writes "Good automation and analytics, but is costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Secure Score writes "Stable product with a valuable identity feature ". Galvanize HighBond is most compared with ACL Analytics, RSA Archer and Workiva Wdesk, whereas Microsoft Secure Score is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Amazon Inspector.

    See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

    We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.