We performed a comparison between Galvanize HighBond and Microsoft Secure Score based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, BitSight, AuditBoard and others in IT Vendor Risk Management."The most valuable feature is automation."
"Microsoft Secure Score's most valuable feature is identity."
"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."
"They could indicate whether a recommendation aligns with different compliance standards."
Galvanize HighBond is ranked 12th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 3 reviews while Microsoft Secure Score is ranked 6th in IT Vendor Risk Management with 1 review. Galvanize HighBond is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Secure Score is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Galvanize HighBond writes "Good automation and analytics, but is costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Secure Score writes "Stable product with a valuable identity feature ". Galvanize HighBond is most compared with ACL Analytics, RSA Archer and Workiva Wdesk, whereas Microsoft Secure Score is most compared with Bitsight Third-Party Risk Management and Amazon Inspector.
See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.