We performed a comparison between Galvanize HighBond and Nexthink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The most valuable feature is automation."
"The solution has reduced the time it takes to resolve issues."
"This is a proactive management tool and we make use of the metrics, dashboard creation and complete remote actions on end user machines."
"All the features of Nexthink are really useful when it comes to providing visibility into the endpoints and the services that we are monitoring, but the most interesting and useful features are the campaign and remote actions."
"Although limited to 100,000,000 events per engine, it is suffice to do investigations for more than 30 days."
"In the past two years, the biggest benefit is that we have been able to identify 57,000-plus defects. These are possible tickets that we are preventing by using Nexthink."
"Nexthink saves a lot of time for the technicians who work on the troubleshooting side...Nexthink provides its users with a very good point of overview and presentation."
"Number of service incidents dropped by more than 20%."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."
"The initial setup needs technical knowledge."
"The solution could provide more training. There should be proper documentation on the solution because even for small issues we have needed to reach out to the support team. The person who is doing all the administration work should have the proper information, but the problem is the documentation is lacking. There is no proper training or documentation available. Nexthink is holding all the information. We want to learn, but you can not without the information."
"In our company, we can't deploy anything from Nexthink the way we can deploy from any other endpoint solutions. It is not possible to create any dashboard in Nexthink...One should be able to schedule monitoring in Nexthink."
"They were having some limitations on the number of alerts that you can generate. This definitely needs to be increased."
"The tool should improve its pricing and performance. It also have nothing related to patch management."
"I would like it if they could put in some patch deployments and compliances."
"The stability of this solution could be greatly improved to avoid performance issues."
"It lacks support for IoT and most network equipment."
Galvanize HighBond is ranked 9th in GRC with 3 reviews while Nexthink is ranked 1st in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) with 20 reviews. Galvanize HighBond is rated 8.6, while Nexthink is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Galvanize HighBond writes "Good automation and analytics, but is costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nexthink writes " A monitoring tool that helps save the time of its users with its features while offering a reasonable amount of stability and scalability". Galvanize HighBond is most compared with ACL Analytics, RSA Archer and Workiva Wdesk, whereas Nexthink is most compared with SysTrack, ControlUp, Alluvio Aternity , Liquidware Stratusphere UX and ConnectWise Automate.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.