Compare Garland PacketMax vs. Interface Masters NPB

Garland PacketMax is ranked 15th in Network Packet Broker while Interface Masters NPB is ranked 12th in Network Packet Broker. Garland PacketMax is rated 0, while Interface Masters NPB is rated 0. On the other hand, Garland PacketMax is most compared with Gigamon and Ixia Network Packet Brokers, whereas Interface Masters NPB is most compared with Gigamon.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
15th
Views
31
Comparisons
26
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
12th
Views
145
Comparisons
100
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 63% of the time.
Compared 100% of the time.
Also Known As
PacketMax Series
Learn
Garland
Video Not Available
Interface Masters Technologies
Video Not Available
Overview

In today’s environment with significant investment in security and monitoring tools, Garland recognizes the need for a cost effective solution that allows the flexibility and speed that is required for the networks of the future. Get the advantages of full-featured NPBs at a significantly less cost. We take the approach of providing solutions that are flexible and scalable for future on-demand growth with excellent ROI.

Garland’s “deconstructed packet brokers” offer a specialized device for each of your needs:

Filtering, aggregation and load balancing

Advanced features like deduplication, packet slicing and time stamping

Hybrid NPB’s with TAP integration

Inline Edge Security solutions

Easily reuse and repurpose devices as needs shift

Fully supported ports - no additional per-port license fees

Offer
Learn more about Garland PacketMax
Learn more about Interface Masters NPB
Sample Customers
cisco, corelight, cpacket networks, dell emc, forescout, gearbit, imperva, mcafee, netfort
Information Not Available
We monitor all Network Packet Broker reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.