We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"We are running at about 90,000 pounds per year. The solution is a licensed cost. The hardware that they gave us was pretty much next to nothing. It is the license that we're paying for."
"The license is based on the concurrent IP addresses that it's investigating. We have 9,800 to 10,000 IP addresses."
"There are additional features that can be purchased in addition to the standard licensing fee, such as Cognito Recall and Stream."
"We have a desire to increase our use. However, it all comes down to budget. It's a very expensive tool that is very difficult to prove business support for. We would like to have two separate networks. We have our corporate network and PCI network, which is segregated due to payment processing. We don't have it for deployed in the PCI network. It would be good to have it fully deployed there to provide us with additional monitoring and control, but the cost associated with their licensing model makes it prohibitively expensive to deploy."
"At the time of purchase, we found the pricing acceptable. We had an urgency to get something in place because we had a minor breach that occurred at the tail end of 2016 to the beginning of 2017. This indicated we had a lack of ability to detect things on the network. Hence, why we moved quickly to get into the tool in place. We found things like Bitcoin mining and botnets which we closed quickly. In that regard, it was worth the money."
"The pricing is very good. It's less expensive than many of the tools out there."
"The pricing is high."
"Their licensing model is antiquated. I'm not a fan of their licensing model. We have to pay for licensing based on four different things. You have to pay based on the number of unique IPs, the number of logs that we send through Recall and Stream, and the size of our environment. They need to simplify their licensing down to just one thing. It should be based on the amount of data, the number of devices, or something else, but there should be just one thing for everything. That's what they need to base their licensing on. Cost-wise, they're not cheap. They were definitely the most expensive option, but you get what you pay for. They're not the cheapest option."
Vectra® is the leader in network detection and response – from cloud and data center workloads to user and IoT devices. Its Cognito® platform accelerates threat detection and investigation using artificial intelligence to collect, store and enrich network metadata with the right context to detect, hunt and investigate known and unknown threats in real time. Vectra offers three applications on the Cognito platform to address high-priority use cases. Cognito Stream™ sends security-enriched metadata to data lakes and SIEMs. Cognito Recall™ is a cloud-based application to store and investigate threats in enriched metadata. And Cognito Detect™ uses AI to reveal and prioritize hidden and unknown attackers at speed.
Garland Prisms unlocks both public and private cloud visibility to enable best-of-breed security and visibility for your network. Our revolutionary, born-in-the cloud solution, is 100% out-of-band and passive, works with any cloud, works with any monitoring tool or system, and supports any cloud traffic mirroring (including Amazon VPC traffic mirroring, Azure vtaps). Easy to deploy, use and disruptively affordable, Garland Prisms provides essential traffic visibility needed for security and devops monitoring and inspection.
Garland Prisms is the most advanced Cloud TAP solution to get cloud packets to monitoring tools and services. Garland Prisms allows organizations to access, process and deliver packet-level traffic from VMs and containers in any cloud. Our next-generation agent technology sends processed packet traffic to your tools and services.
With Garland Prisms, customers activate and run the tools of their choice to gain the critical visibility and control they need. Garland Prisms allows organizations to accelerate their cloud transformations with clarity and confidence.
Advanced threat monitoring combining network traffic, security logs, and entity context.
Garland Prisms is ranked 23rd in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) while Securonix NTA is ranked 19th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA). Garland Prisms is rated 0.0, while Securonix NTA is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Garland Prisms is most compared with , whereas Securonix NTA is most compared with Darktrace and ExtraHop Reveal(X) Cloud.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.