Gemalto Protiva vs RSA Adaptive Authentication comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Gemalto Protiva and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.
To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature for us is the ability to use Active Directory groups as virtual containers instead of domains because it means that we can control our access groups better."

More Gemalto Protiva Pros →

"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA.""Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services.""Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features.""The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement.""The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pros →

Cons
"The user interface needs improvement."

More Gemalto Protiva Cons →

"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated.""It has taken years to implement.""Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction.""I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages...""Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further.""RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."

More RSA Adaptive Authentication Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is a cost-effective solution compared to some other products out there."
  • More Gemalto Protiva Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "You may need to opt for second best if funding is low and the number of users is huge. However, the pricing is able to be negotiated if your user figures are huge."
  • "Keep the proxy service layer on premises. That consumes SaaS security services on the back-end."
  • "Customers need to deploy the solution in a very expensive infrastructure. RSA should should think about a less expensive infrastructure for customers because the solution costs around $100,000, and the infrastructure needed to support that solution may be even more expensive than that price."
  • "The pricing is $50 per head, yearly."
  • More RSA Adaptive Authentication Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Authentication Systems
    25th
    Views
    327
    Comparisons
    272
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Protiva
    Learn More
    Overview
    Protiva is a strong authentication platform that was developed to incorporate the strengths of Gemalto's smart card technology. It consists of a family of smart card-based user authentication devices, a browser plug-in, an authentication and customer care server and a self-service user care portal.
    RSA Adaptive Authentication is a risk-based two-factor authentication solution providing cost-effective protection for an entire user base. Adaptive Authentication secures online portals, SSL VPNs, and web access management portals for different types of organizations in the healthcare, insurance, enterprise, government, financial services, and other industries. Based on the transparent two-factor authentication technology, Adaptive Authentication works behind the scenes to authenticate end users and transactions based on individual end user and device profiles. In addition, Adaptive Authentication uses the RSA Risk Engine to estimate the level of risk for the specific activity and uses information collected from the RSAeFraudNetwork (a cross-organization, cross-application, cross-border online fraud network) to identify fraudulent activities. The Policy Manager determines what actions must be performed, depending on the risk score and other parameters.
    Sample Customers
    Exostar, Sunrise Health Region, Baker Tilly, Seattle Children's, SEW-Eurodrive
    ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm45%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Insurance Company5%
    Healthcare Company5%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise86%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Authentication Systems
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Gemalto Protiva doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while RSA Adaptive Authentication is ranked 25th in Authentication Systems. Gemalto Protiva is rated 7.6, while RSA Adaptive Authentication is rated 6.8. The top reviewer of Gemalto Protiva writes "Strong authentication permits our organization to improve security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA Adaptive Authentication writes "It stops fraud in banks and reduces their costs". Gemalto Protiva is most compared with , whereas RSA Adaptive Authentication is most compared with RSA Authentication Manager, ThreatMetrix, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and IBM Trusteer.

    See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

    We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.