Compare Gemalto SafeNet Payment HSM vs. Thales payShield

Gemalto SafeNet Payment HSM is ranked 3rd in Payment HSM while Thales payShield is ranked 2nd in Payment HSM. Gemalto SafeNet Payment HSM is rated 0, while Thales payShield is rated 0. On the other hand, Gemalto SafeNet Payment HSM is most compared with Thales payShield, Atalla Hardware Security Module and Futurex Excrypt, whereas Thales payShield is most compared with Gemalto SafeNet Payment HSM, Atalla Hardware Security Module and Futurex Excrypt.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ranking
3rd
out of 5 in Payment HSM
Views
456
Comparisons
290
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 5 in Payment HSM
Views
642
Comparisons
372
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Top Comparisons
Compared 20% of the time.
Also Known As
SafeNet Payment HSM, Luna EFTpayShield, payShield 9000
Learn
Thales e-Security
Thales e-Security
Overview

SafeNet Payment HSM – formerly Luna EFT – provides PCI-HSM 2.0 and APCA CECS Certification for secure financial transactions. As a PCI-Certified hardware security module (HSM), SafeNet Payment HSM adheres to the highest level of security in the industry. The PCI HSM standard, first issued by the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) in 2009, defines a set of requirements for HSMs to use in several areas throughout the payment process.

payShield 9000 supports payment applications for contact chip, contactless chip and mobile secure elements. The solution addresses evolving standards from EMVCo, PCI SSC, GlobalPlatform and Multos International.

Offer
Learn more about Gemalto SafeNet Payment HSM
Learn more about Thales payShield
Sample Customers
Tutuka, PayfairCon-way, Delta Dental, Cadence Design Systems
We monitor all Payment HSM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.