We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."First of all, the solution is very simple."
"Okta integrates well with other solutions. Once you have integrated an application into Okta and onboarded a user, they will be onboarded for just-in-time provisioning."
"The product’s most valuable feature is multifactor authentication."
"The support for YubiKey is really good because you don't actually have to type in your username and password."
"I am able to authenticate my users on cloud and SaaS applications such as Workday through Okta workflows."
"The most valuable features are ease of operation and visibility."
"The initial setup is easy."
"A solution that's easy to use, stable, and reliable."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the support system, they are too slow."
"The lifecycle management part can be improved. It should also have identity governance and the ability to choose a specific factor authentication at the application level. Its licensing and pricing can also be improved."
"We experienced some technical glitches that need to be resolved."
"A room for improvement in Okta Workforce Identity is its price. It could be cheaper. The biggest benefit of the solution is that everything works securely without extra steps, so you're saving on your workforce's time and effort because your applications work smoothly and securely, but you'd need to pay some amount of money for that. Another area that could be improved, though not necessarily regarding Okta Workforce Identity, is the SSO applications because so many of the source applications charge extra money to put the SSO to work, which means you have to buy a more expensive license. Nowadays, SSO is a mainstream functionality and it should be out-of-the-box in those applications because it's so easy to set up."
"SSO and MFA for improved end-user experience, and protection against password spray attacks, account password self-service."
"This user integration with the Okta integration network could be simplified."
"The initial setup can be complex at first."
"The only area of concern in the solution stems from the fact that my company needs some help regarding the setup phase from a partner."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 19th in Single Sign-On (SSO). Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Auth0 and SailPoint IdentityIQ.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.