We performed a comparison between Okta Workforce Identity and Thales SafeNet Trusted Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Auth0 and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."We find the solution to be stable."
"This solution has a lot of capabilities and features."
"Okta Workforce Identity is easy to use and has a lot of components."
"The solution can scale very well."
"The most valuable features of Okta Workforce Identity are SSO, MFA, and beneficial feature sets."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the integration with external websites one-factor authentication."
"It is dependent on the evolution of your user base. It depends on usage per user, so the more sign-ins there are, the more expensive it becomes, so it works best for smaller companies from a financial perspective."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The solution is simple to use."
"The interface is easy to use."
"The validation and integrity features of the endpoint are great."
"We've not had any problems with Okta."
"The pricing could be improved."
"We have experienced some challenges in integrating this solution with Scope and Cognito."
"The solution lacks an on-premises deployment model so it can't offer a hybrid solution. It would be ideal if clients had options that weren't just cloud-based."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the way passwords are reset and how it interfaces with Microsoft."
"The error logging could be improved. Okta doesn't provide enough details when you are troubleshooting an issue. It's often difficult to fix it from our end, so we always need additional support from Okta."
"RESTful Web Service calls and their response seem a bit slow."
"They also have single sign-on (SSO). When we bought Okta Workforce Identity a year and a half ago, I was also looking at SSO, but not much documentation was available for SSO. The documentation for SSO should be a little more robust for somebody who is implementing it for the first time."
"SafeNet's reporting and monitoring features could be improved."
"Lacks the ability to integrate network monitoring solutions and authenticate the app users."
"There's a dependency on Microsoft Azure."
Earn 20 points
Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 4th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 56 reviews while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is ranked 19th in Single Sign-On (SSO). Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6, while Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Thales SafeNet Trusted Access writes "Simple to use, easy to set up, and performs well". Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0, whereas Thales SafeNet Trusted Access is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Auth0.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors, best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors, and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.