Compare Genero vs. Microsoft Visual Studio
Use Genero? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Genero vs. Microsoft Visual Studio and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Information Not Available
"The price is good."
"There's a community edition that is absolutely free to use. It's pretty good."
"The introduction of the Community Version allows some people to use it free of charge."
"Our purchasing department pays a fair price for it."
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which .NET Development Services solutions are best for your needs.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: It is convenient to have all the development tools in one interface.
Top Answer: The company buys and pays for the product. I think our purchasing department gets a fair price for it. But the actual price is something I do not have any idea of.
Top Answer: I think that because it integrates many tools into one interface the startup is very slow. It would be nice if the startup speed could be improved. Maybe in the future, they can provide a better… more »
Views
196
Comparisons
76
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
2,005
Comparisons
611
Reviews
9
Average Words per Review
466
Rating
8.9
Compared 67% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Genero Enterprise comprises Studio â a visual programming development framework that models apps from three basic diagrams that describe: the application workflow, the database relationships and the user interface. The application is generated from these diagrams using customizable code templates that can be adapted to suit your own corporate needs and standards. Custom business rules can be inserted using Code Editor â a language sensitive editor that corrects syntax in real-time. Develop in teams, locally and remotely via the Subversion source code control system.
Visual Studio.NET is the umbrella that represents the key pieces of the .NET platform delivered from Microsoft, including the .NET Framework, the recently announced .NET Core, and a shared common layer of packages, compilers and runtime. Read this .NET blog post about the evolution of the platform and the different pieces that make .NET 2015.
Learn more about Genero
Learn more about Microsoft Visual Studio
Asus, PBS, AT&T, CVS Pharmacy, LHDN Malaysia, Fox Conn, Xcel Energy, Kmart, Debswana, Reiff Groupe, UK Ministry of Defence, BBC, Biel, Sears
Knab, Hamburg Port Authority, Kecioren Municipality, National Instruments, Hamburg Port Authority, Government of Odisha, Kongsberg Maritime AS
No Data Available
Manufacturing Company56%
University11%
Consumer Goods Company11%
Computer Software Company11%
Comms Service Provider43%
Computer Software Company13%
Educational Organization12%
Energy/Utilities Company5%
No Data Available
Small Business50%
Midsize Enterprise6%
Large Enterprise44%
Find out what your peers are saying about Genero vs. Microsoft Visual Studio and other solutions. Updated: March 2021.
474,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Genero is ranked 9th in .NET Development Services while Microsoft Visual Studio is ranked 1st in .NET Development Services with 7 reviews. Genero is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Visual Studio is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Visual Studio writes "Great integrated debugger, offers lots of features, and is extremely stable". Genero is most compared with , whereas Microsoft Visual Studio is most compared with SharePoint Designer, Zend Studio and Microsoft Silverlight.
See our list of best .NET Development Services vendors.
We monitor all .NET Development Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.